• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Blemain Finance

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Blemain Finance

    Originally posted by welshperson View Post
    Did your broker get you a mortgage and this loan?

    Or did you get a mortgage and then contact a broker for a loan after you had the house

    WP
    errrm, at first i believed he got us both loans, but my wife says we got the halifax loan and then called him when we couldn't get the extra money. So I'm really unsure now, is there anyway to find out?
    Thanks
    WP
    Last edited by Curlyben; 14th January 2012, 22:50:PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

    Comment


    • Re: Blemain Finance

      Scucliliory is just spam - I'll report it!

      Hope you guys don't mind me subbing?
      CAVEAT LECTOR

      This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

      You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
      Cohen, Herb


      There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
      gets his brain a-going.
      Phelps, C. C.


      "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
      The last words of John Sedgwick

      Comment


      • Re: Blemain Finance

        ahh thanks charity

        Comment


        • Re: Blemain Finance

          IMO your agreement is completely unenforceable it does not comply with the CCA or the CC Regulations 1983 amended 2004...the Apr is stated as a monthly rate of interest and APR stands for Anual Percentage Rate .........the cost of credit is not set out as per regulations.

          Regina v Kettering Majestrates Court ruled this.
          Regina -v- Kettering Magistrates' Court ex parte MRB Insurance Brokers Limited [2000] EWHC Admin 3204 Apr 2000
          Admn
          Schiemann LJ, Douglas Brown JConsumer, Crime, Financial ServicesCasemap
          1 Cites
          A statement of an APR in the sale of a financial services product remained a price indication, and, if it was miscalculated, that was a misleading price indication, and criminal, despite provisions in the Consumer Credit legislation. What was given was a price under the contract: "The total amount payable under the contract which can properly be described as the price, should be arrived at by reference to the APR. The APR given was very substantially below the true APR and Mr Pulford Junior was given a totally false indication as to how the aggregate of the sums required to be paid would be determined. In those circumstances clearly a misleading indication as to price was given. The question as to the enforceability of the agreement is quite irrelevant." As to the effect of the section: "Section 170(1) is not an obstacle to a prosecution under the Consumer Protection Act 1987, where the provisions of Section 20 are apt to cover a factual situation such as that which arose in this case."Consumer Protection Act 1987 20 - Consumer Credit Act 1974 170(1)

          I think Your APR should be shown as 13.02% on your agreement....the tolerance for APR to be shown lower than it actually is ..........is 0.1% .

          Sparkie
          Just my opinion get it checked properly

          Comment


          • Re: Blemain Finance

            Hi,

            I'm no expert on the CCA, so can someone describe the effect of HHJ Waksman's description re the difference between APR & stated monthly interest as the 'driver' in the Sternlight judgement?

            http://www.lpc-law.co.uk/lpc_law_leg...e.php?lu=32838
            CAVEAT LECTOR

            This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

            You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
            Cohen, Herb


            There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
            gets his brain a-going.
            Phelps, C. C.


            "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
            The last words of John Sedgwick

            Comment


            • Re: Blemain Finance

              Originally posted by charitynjw View Post
              Hi,

              I'm no expert on the CCA, so can someone describe the effect of HHJ Waksman's description re the difference between APR & stated monthly interest as the 'driver' in the Sternlight judgement?

              http://www.lpc-law.co.uk/lpc_law_leg...e.php?lu=32838
              I'm no expert on the CCA either but I think the answer is here in Waksman ruling.........
              Apr is a prescribed term.......and in any event I think the Kettering ruling over comes the Waksman ruling anyway as it was ruled a criminal offence ...DESPITE consumer legislation.....and under the Proceeds of Crime Cat 2002 ...No-one should gain amd no-one should suffer loss from a criminal act

              Waksman said
              "In respect of regulated agreements signed before 6th April 2007, if the agreement fails to contain the prescribed terms required by s.61(1)(a) then, pursuant to s.127(3), the court is unable to grant an enforcement order in relation to the agreement, giving rise to the phrase "irredeemably unenforceable" (per Lord Hoffmann in Dimond v Lovell [2002] 1 AC 384)".

              Just my ramblings as usual

              Comment


              • Re: Blemain Finance

                Originally posted by Sparkie1723 View Post
                IMO your agreement is completely unenforceable it does not comply with the CCA or the CC Regulations 1983 amended 2004...the Apr is stated as a monthly rate of interest and APR stands for Anual Percentage Rate .........the cost of credit is not set out as per regulations.

                Regina v Kettering Majestrates Court ruled this.
                Regina -v- Kettering Magistrates' Court ex parte MRB Insurance Brokers Limited [2000] EWHC Admin 3204 Apr 2000
                Admn
                Schiemann LJ, Douglas Brown JConsumer, Crime, Financial ServicesCasemap
                1 Cites
                A statement of an APR in the sale of a financial services product remained a price indication, and, if it was miscalculated, that was a misleading price indication, and criminal, despite provisions in the Consumer Credit legislation. What was given was a price under the contract: "The total amount payable under the contract which can properly be described as the price, should be arrived at by reference to the APR. The APR given was very substantially below the true APR and Mr Pulford Junior was given a totally false indication as to how the aggregate of the sums required to be paid would be determined. In those circumstances clearly a misleading indication as to price was given. The question as to the enforceability of the agreement is quite irrelevant." As to the effect of the section: "Section 170(1) is not an obstacle to a prosecution under the Consumer Protection Act 1987, where the provisions of Section 20 are apt to cover a factual situation such as that which arose in this case."Consumer Protection Act 1987 20 - Consumer Credit Act 1974 170(1)

                I think Your APR should be shown as 13.02% on your agreement....the tolerance for APR to be shown lower than it actually is ..........is 0.1% .

                Sparkie
                Just my opinion get it checked properly

                WOW, errm, now I'm in above my head! Where do i go from here?

                Comment


                • Re: Blemain Finance

                  Sorry, funkyphantom,

                  Just some 'chewing the fat' - though often it's better to chuck something in at this stage & kick it around a bit!
                  CAVEAT LECTOR

                  This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

                  You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
                  Cohen, Herb


                  There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
                  gets his brain a-going.
                  Phelps, C. C.


                  "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
                  The last words of John Sedgwick

                  Comment


                  • Re: Blemain Finance

                    ahh i see, if we're chewing the fat, a question if i may?
                    On a financial agreement such as this, shouldn't the second witness box also be signed? baring in mind the first witness box is signed by my very dodgy financial advisor. My thinking id this: Had my second witness been independent, then maybe they could have warned me what i was getting my family into?

                    Comment


                    • Re: Blemain Finance

                      According to s8 of the CCA, a regulated consumer credit agreement is

                      a) an agreement between two parties
                      b) one of whom, 'the debtor', is an individual*
                      c) the other, the 'creditor', is 'any other person'**
                      d) by which the creditor provides the debtor with credit***
                      e) where the agreement is not an exempt agreement

                      & the agreement was made on or after 01/04/1977 (Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Commencement No. 2) Order 1977, art. 2 (1)

                      * can include partnerships & sole traders
                      ** any legal entity, corporate or unincorporate
                      ***credit limits have altered from time to time

                      A security, as defined by s189(!) of the Act, may be part of the regulated agreement.

                      However, I can't find any mention of any witness signatures requirement in order for an agreement to be a regulated agreement under the CCA.
                      CAVEAT LECTOR

                      This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

                      You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
                      Cohen, Herb


                      There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
                      gets his brain a-going.
                      Phelps, C. C.


                      "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
                      The last words of John Sedgwick

                      Comment


                      • Re: Blemain Finance

                        Ok thanks charity

                        Comment


                        • Re: Blemain Finance

                          For the sake of clarity in this case & others where 127(3) may apply (ie, irredeemably unenforceable), is the APR a 'prescribed term', or is it a term which is 'embodied' in the agreement (which is then up to the discretion of the court whether to enforce)?

                          My feeling is that the latter is correct.
                          Last edited by charitynjw; 15th January 2012, 16:07:PM.
                          CAVEAT LECTOR

                          This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

                          You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
                          Cohen, Herb


                          There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
                          gets his brain a-going.
                          Phelps, C. C.


                          "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
                          The last words of John Sedgwick

                          Comment


                          • Re: Blemain Finance

                            Originally posted by charitynjw View Post
                            For the sake of clarity in this case & others where 127(3) may apply (ie, irredeemably unenforceable), is the APR a 'prescribed term', or is it a term which is 'embodied' in the agreement (which is then up to the discretion of the court whether to enforce)?

                            My feeling is that the latter is correct.
                            Think you are right on this one charitynjw................But then the case I quoted said it was a misrepresentaion despite Consumer law .....meaning this over ruled the CCA Regs because of the criminal aspect......worth pursuing deeper I think

                            But then like you I ain't a Lawyer ....... me...I'm just a "mumbler"

                            Sparkie

                            Comment


                            • Re: Blemain Finance

                              Im still confused is my next step getting a SAR?
                              Thanks

                              Comment


                              • Re: Blemain Finance

                                Originally posted by funkyphantom View Post
                                Im still confused is my next step getting a SAR?
                                Thanks
                                Why not? - Shake the tree, you never know what might fall out!

                                Some info re SARs

                                http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_organisati...onal_data.aspx

                                & a template letter here

                                http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...ad.php?t=14196

                                (I would add that the £10 payment must be used for the SAR only, & for no other purpose)

                                & don't forget to obtain proof of postage.
                                CAVEAT LECTOR

                                This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

                                You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
                                Cohen, Herb


                                There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
                                gets his brain a-going.
                                Phelps, C. C.


                                "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
                                The last words of John Sedgwick

                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                                Working...
                                X