Hi Celestine, thanks for commenting. I'm meant to be replying to their email today, I don't want them to strike out my defence. Should I respond? Or just leave it?*
Lowell's CCJ claim
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
If they apply to strike out your defence you will have opportunity to file a witness statement against it, in which you’ll cite incomplete terms.COMPLETING AN N180 DIRECTIONS QUESTIONNAIRE (SMALL CLAIMS TRACK) GUIDE
My posts here are based on my experience of a variety of life events. I have no formal legal training & if in doubt take professional legal advice or contact CAB. If you follow anything I write here you do so at your own risk & I accept no liability for any loss, costs or other outcomes.
Private messages are disabled as help is only offered publicly. I do not come on here in the evening, at weekends or on public holidays.
Comment
-
Hi yes, this:
If they make an application to strike out your defence then you will have opportunity to supply a witness statement against the application, you would evidence the incomplete terms as your reason that their application should be defeated.COMPLETING AN N180 DIRECTIONS QUESTIONNAIRE (SMALL CLAIMS TRACK) GUIDE
My posts here are based on my experience of a variety of life events. I have no formal legal training & if in doubt take professional legal advice or contact CAB. If you follow anything I write here you do so at your own risk & I accept no liability for any loss, costs or other outcomes.
Private messages are disabled as help is only offered publicly. I do not come on here in the evening, at weekends or on public holidays.
Comment
-
Im sorry guys but the incomplete terms argument wont fly. The terms are there. they are clearly marked on the agreement 1,2,3 the following terms are over the page it seems, but 1 2 and 3 are there.I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.
If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .
I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.
You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.
- 1 thank
Comment
-
I cant think of anything at the moment based on the papers. I must stress however that papers arent always the only thing needed for a case before we can offer any pointers. For example the issue of any other disputes with the lender may be worth look at
Have they treated you fairly
Was there any irresponsible lending
Are there goods purchased on credit which were defective and which would fall within s75 Consumer Credit Act
Is there an unfair relationship etc.
These points fall away from the actual papers and relate to the facts of the case, we dont know whether the answers to the above are yes or no, we dont know if there are more questions that may apply to your case.I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.
If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .
I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.
You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.
Comment
-
Hi,
sorry I never saw this message months ago for some reason?
I've just received another letter from Lowell, a settlement proposal without prejudice to avoid costs.
The last letter they sent in June, it was left that if I didn't respond I would receive the court paperwork but all I have received so far is this letter.
They've given me the option of paying £1400 in one lump sum.
A reduced settlement of £1500 by monthly instalments of £40 through a Tomlin order
And they've cleverly continued on the next page which I didn't see until now, that Tesco is willing to consider a reasonable offer of settlement from me by way of lump sum or monthly instalments. The offer remains open until the 5th of January 2020 apparently. Which I've missed by almost a year. Excuse my French but what a bunch of ****ing monkeys, can't get a bloody date right
Comment
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Court Claim ?
Guides and LettersSHORTCUTS
Pre-Action Letters
First Steps
Check dates
Income/Expenditure
Acknowledge Claim
CCA Request
CPR 31.14 Request
Subject Access Request Letter
Example Defence
Set Aside Application
Witness Statements
Directions Questionnaire
Statute Barred Letter
Voluntary Termination: Letter Templates
A guide to voluntary termination: Your rights
Loading...
Loading...
Comment