From the 'information' posted on TrustPilot:
At a pinch I could be persuaded on 1. The rest I'm unconvinced with.
*
Following the presentation of our case by our Company Secretary, the court made the following findings of fact.
1) Private Parking Appeals supplied, in full, the service for which he paid, securing cancellation of the parking charge within 6 weeks of his application
2) His review was false in a material particular, and his intention in publishing a false review was malicious.
3) By publishing the review, he was in breach of our terms and conditions, which he freely agreed to.
4) His action, in publishing a malicious, false review was to damage the company
5) As a result of his actions, the company suffered damage.
*
Comment