As you suggest R0b, it is down to interpretation.
I agree that the letter is drafted to scare the uninitiated into thinking it presages court action, but the use of "may" IMO suggests they will claim the letter just sets out their client's possible course of action.
It really is a case of either telling them briefly why you dispute the invoice or challenging them on the basis of not following pre action protocols and issuing a non compliant LBA.
I prefer the first option, R0b the second.
That's the best of this forum... different viewpoints without rancour
I agree that the letter is drafted to scare the uninitiated into thinking it presages court action, but the use of "may" IMO suggests they will claim the letter just sets out their client's possible course of action.
It really is a case of either telling them briefly why you dispute the invoice or challenging them on the basis of not following pre action protocols and issuing a non compliant LBA.
I prefer the first option, R0b the second.
That's the best of this forum... different viewpoints without rancour
Comment