Re: Dogtired's Barclays PPI Claim
Keep on at them about the data they have used for the calculation, DT. They have already contradicted themselves, as Wales has pointed out. Foreign call centres are pretty useless with matters like this, and it is always best to get everything down in writing, anyway.
Regarding the 'dot matrix' print-outs - they are required to provide the data in a legible form. The use of an antiquated dot-matrix printer suggests that the DSAR dept are using these intentionally in order to provide unclear copies. I think it would be worth replying to them, insisting that they provide the data in legible form, and suggest that they use a more modern laser printer for this. Also insist that the data is sent by a secure 'signed-for' method, and not just shoved through the letterbox, and that the ICO would take a dim view of all this.
Can you see from the applic. form copy you have if PPI was ticked or otherwise requested ?
Can you see a date ?
Keep on at them about the data they have used for the calculation, DT. They have already contradicted themselves, as Wales has pointed out. Foreign call centres are pretty useless with matters like this, and it is always best to get everything down in writing, anyway.
Regarding the 'dot matrix' print-outs - they are required to provide the data in a legible form. The use of an antiquated dot-matrix printer suggests that the DSAR dept are using these intentionally in order to provide unclear copies. I think it would be worth replying to them, insisting that they provide the data in legible form, and suggest that they use a more modern laser printer for this. Also insist that the data is sent by a secure 'signed-for' method, and not just shoved through the letterbox, and that the ICO would take a dim view of all this.
Can you see from the applic. form copy you have if PPI was ticked or otherwise requested ?
Can you see a date ?
Comment