Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Hello troops and troopers and trooperesses......
I know patience is the name of the game but even if it does nothing, I'm gonna do something. Does that even make sense?
Firstly I have no issues with how long it takes for a final decision to be reached. There is nothing I can do about that. My issue lies with the way the banks blatantly defy their regulator by not processing complaints during the Judicial Review.
Can someone please clarify exactly how banks 'should' be processing complaints during the Judicial Review?
Are they allowed to put some on hold? None? Them all? Only ones affected by the Judicial Review? If they are only allowed to put complaints on hold that are directly affected by the Judicial Review, who decides what complaints are affected then? The banks? Hardly fair if this is the case.
I know I can go to FOS but as I have said in previous posts I could be looking at up to 2 years and maybe more for a decision. I am claiming quite a bit of missold PPI on behalf of my dad. He is in his early 60's and hopes to retire in the next 6-12 months. He has worked and paid his taxes all his life. Why should he have to wait 2 years and maybe more on the FOS to get a decision on his case just because the banks are getting way with treating their regulator with complete and utter contempt. Why should my mum and dad not enjoy their retirement now with money the banks owe them for missold PPI? It's the banks that should be sorting out the complaints not the FOS. How can they get away with this? How? Why? We the tax payer own the bloody banks and they still get to treat us like something on the bottom of their £500 loafers!
I have drafted a two very strong worded letters for Barclays and MBNA with regards to their stance on processing complaints. However as stated above I would like clarification on how EXACTLY the FSA have asked the banks to process PPI complaints during the Judicial Review.
I have also been in contact with my local MP. You might of heard of his father, Ian Paisley. His son is also called Ian. He has personally acknowledged my correspondence about the issue and hopes to get back to me within a timely manner.
I know this might achieve absolutely nothing but I just wanna do something. I want to annoy, pester, contact, call, e-mail and send letters to the banks as often as possible.
Thanks for reading.
Hello troops and troopers and trooperesses......
I know patience is the name of the game but even if it does nothing, I'm gonna do something. Does that even make sense?
Firstly I have no issues with how long it takes for a final decision to be reached. There is nothing I can do about that. My issue lies with the way the banks blatantly defy their regulator by not processing complaints during the Judicial Review.
Can someone please clarify exactly how banks 'should' be processing complaints during the Judicial Review?
Are they allowed to put some on hold? None? Them all? Only ones affected by the Judicial Review? If they are only allowed to put complaints on hold that are directly affected by the Judicial Review, who decides what complaints are affected then? The banks? Hardly fair if this is the case.
I know I can go to FOS but as I have said in previous posts I could be looking at up to 2 years and maybe more for a decision. I am claiming quite a bit of missold PPI on behalf of my dad. He is in his early 60's and hopes to retire in the next 6-12 months. He has worked and paid his taxes all his life. Why should he have to wait 2 years and maybe more on the FOS to get a decision on his case just because the banks are getting way with treating their regulator with complete and utter contempt. Why should my mum and dad not enjoy their retirement now with money the banks owe them for missold PPI? It's the banks that should be sorting out the complaints not the FOS. How can they get away with this? How? Why? We the tax payer own the bloody banks and they still get to treat us like something on the bottom of their £500 loafers!
I have drafted a two very strong worded letters for Barclays and MBNA with regards to their stance on processing complaints. However as stated above I would like clarification on how EXACTLY the FSA have asked the banks to process PPI complaints during the Judicial Review.
I have also been in contact with my local MP. You might of heard of his father, Ian Paisley. His son is also called Ian. He has personally acknowledged my correspondence about the issue and hopes to get back to me within a timely manner.
I know this might achieve absolutely nothing but I just wanna do something. I want to annoy, pester, contact, call, e-mail and send letters to the banks as often as possible.
Thanks for reading.
Comment