Re: Court Claim Help Please - Natwest / Irwin Mitchell
Thanks Budgie,
I agree - let sleeping dogs lie, for the moment anyway !
With regard to contacting IM before they contact me I'm not really sure - my 'initial' thought is that the courts have received everything from me, in the timescales we have been asked to work too, yet Irwin Mitchell seem to have shown the court no respect, to date, and have abused the cpr situation and the courts procedures / timescales ? The court has now put the ball firmly back in their 'court' so is the onus not now on them to comply with their instructions - not possibly for us to remind them ? (Just my 'initial' thoughts !) ?
IF I.M. don't make any contact then I don't understand why the court would put a stay on the claim - surely they'd acknowledge that I.M. brought the claim and then didn't follow it through and strengthen my case for it simply being thrown out ?
Still no CCA or similar has been forthcoming ! I can't help feeling this has just been an abuse of the judical system, hasn't it ?
By the way re. phone calls - I shouldn't get any of these as a) I don't think they have a number for me and b) I've previously written to them, anyway, telling them I'm only prepared to communicate in writing, just in case. They have NEVER been able to telephone me !
Please, Budgie, don't think I'm trying to undermine your fantastic assistance - I'm just trying to throw some 'thoughts' into the pot to help me 'understand' the situation better - ultimately I'm here for some 'advise' and appreciate all that is passed in my direction !
Kind regards,
R
Thanks Budgie,
I agree - let sleeping dogs lie, for the moment anyway !
With regard to contacting IM before they contact me I'm not really sure - my 'initial' thought is that the courts have received everything from me, in the timescales we have been asked to work too, yet Irwin Mitchell seem to have shown the court no respect, to date, and have abused the cpr situation and the courts procedures / timescales ? The court has now put the ball firmly back in their 'court' so is the onus not now on them to comply with their instructions - not possibly for us to remind them ? (Just my 'initial' thoughts !) ?
IF I.M. don't make any contact then I don't understand why the court would put a stay on the claim - surely they'd acknowledge that I.M. brought the claim and then didn't follow it through and strengthen my case for it simply being thrown out ?
Still no CCA or similar has been forthcoming ! I can't help feeling this has just been an abuse of the judical system, hasn't it ?
By the way re. phone calls - I shouldn't get any of these as a) I don't think they have a number for me and b) I've previously written to them, anyway, telling them I'm only prepared to communicate in writing, just in case. They have NEVER been able to telephone me !
Please, Budgie, don't think I'm trying to undermine your fantastic assistance - I'm just trying to throw some 'thoughts' into the pot to help me 'understand' the situation better - ultimately I'm here for some 'advise' and appreciate all that is passed in my direction !
Kind regards,
R
Comment