Re: General Election 2010 Thread
Spoken from the heart Jester, that comes through in your thoughtful post.
I am reminded of a past event re industrial injuries and in particular- breathing and lung conditions. I overheard a conversation at an airport some years ago. I overheard it largely because the brash lawyer was full of himself and could not contain his glee and wanted everyone to know his "victory". It related to a court hearing at which it had been decided that a limit was to be set on the amount victims could claim, increased burden of proof required (if for example a person had smoked) and the time limits for the deceased relatives to claim within and tightened legal claim procedures which put off the day of judgement. The lawyer seemed to represent insurance companies and was boasting about how much would be saved in payouts and the positive impact on share and trading and his own firm of solicitors. That to me sums up the type of society engendered by the Tories.
The glee in his voice made me incredulous as it contrasted with the victims situation and the potential victims and their dependents circumstances.
Cetelco- I mentioned Scotland and Wales. I know that the Scot Nats who are only in power for the first time have been a refreshing change in government. They are doing a good job in difficult circumstances. That shows it is not impossible for another party to assume the mantle of power or to share power ie Liberals who have also shared power with Labour in Scotland. It also shows that if things in the UK as a whole don't change that Independence is not that far off, the first step has been taken with a devolved government. I have never voted for the Nats BTW.
Jester- I agree re Scargil- re the second time around, but he was fighting a government who had carefully planned the dismantling of the mining industry. (a mining industry which then left us entirely dependent on imported coal, when investment in the pits and new technologies might have secured some pits futures). Cetelco, the minors were not driven by greed- what is your reference for that statement please. They were driven by the dismantling of the industry and the impact on their futures and their communities, which were around the pits.
Lets not forget that the current economic situation was not caused by Labour, that can't be airbrushed. Thats a direct result of western financial institutions and greed- of a kind never seen or envisaged- of a kind that were encouraged by the Conservatives- Council house sales, share owning "democracy", over availability of credit, dependence of economy on increasing house prices, etc, etc, etc. That was on the watch of the Tories.
Yes mistakes have been made by Labour but, they have managed the situation temporarily. The scale of the greed has however left this country with a massive burden and the very likely prospect of a further depression, and division within the UK, the scale of which will be unlike anything encountered before- regardless of who wins the next election.
Spoken from the heart Jester, that comes through in your thoughtful post.
I am reminded of a past event re industrial injuries and in particular- breathing and lung conditions. I overheard a conversation at an airport some years ago. I overheard it largely because the brash lawyer was full of himself and could not contain his glee and wanted everyone to know his "victory". It related to a court hearing at which it had been decided that a limit was to be set on the amount victims could claim, increased burden of proof required (if for example a person had smoked) and the time limits for the deceased relatives to claim within and tightened legal claim procedures which put off the day of judgement. The lawyer seemed to represent insurance companies and was boasting about how much would be saved in payouts and the positive impact on share and trading and his own firm of solicitors. That to me sums up the type of society engendered by the Tories.
The glee in his voice made me incredulous as it contrasted with the victims situation and the potential victims and their dependents circumstances.
Cetelco- I mentioned Scotland and Wales. I know that the Scot Nats who are only in power for the first time have been a refreshing change in government. They are doing a good job in difficult circumstances. That shows it is not impossible for another party to assume the mantle of power or to share power ie Liberals who have also shared power with Labour in Scotland. It also shows that if things in the UK as a whole don't change that Independence is not that far off, the first step has been taken with a devolved government. I have never voted for the Nats BTW.
Jester- I agree re Scargil- re the second time around, but he was fighting a government who had carefully planned the dismantling of the mining industry. (a mining industry which then left us entirely dependent on imported coal, when investment in the pits and new technologies might have secured some pits futures). Cetelco, the minors were not driven by greed- what is your reference for that statement please. They were driven by the dismantling of the industry and the impact on their futures and their communities, which were around the pits.
Lets not forget that the current economic situation was not caused by Labour, that can't be airbrushed. Thats a direct result of western financial institutions and greed- of a kind never seen or envisaged- of a kind that were encouraged by the Conservatives- Council house sales, share owning "democracy", over availability of credit, dependence of economy on increasing house prices, etc, etc, etc. That was on the watch of the Tories.
Yes mistakes have been made by Labour but, they have managed the situation temporarily. The scale of the greed has however left this country with a massive burden and the very likely prospect of a further depression, and division within the UK, the scale of which will be unlike anything encountered before- regardless of who wins the next election.
Comment