• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

General Election 2010 Thread

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: General Election 2010 Thread

    Originally posted by Cetelco View Post
    Yes, mining is safer than driving.

    Between 1950 and 2000 mining in this country killed 16,599 people yet between 1999 and 2008, a total of 32,298 deaths were recorded on our roads, approximately 49% of whom were car drivers. Thus, driving is a great deal more dangerous than mining.

    These are not mere statistics, these are real deaths, of real people.

    Despite being much less dangerous than driving, the media attention received by mining deaths is much greater. Furthermore, the outrage over the injustice of the deaths is also disproportionately greater for mining. Probably because infrequent, geographically concentrated, large losses of life like mine disasters attract more attention than frequent, geographically dispersed, small losses of life like car accidents. The result is a distorted perception of risk, but the simple fact of the matter is, mining is much safer than driving.

    It also seems curious to me that you insist on defending an occupation that you have stated is horribly dangerous, has in fact killed nine of your family members and yet you condemn Margaret Thatcher for ending it. Perhaps if she had acted sooner, or better yet, the previous Labour Government had shown half the courage she displayed and shut down the industry earlier, those people and many more like them would still be alive? It seems to me that you are arguing for people to be able to kill themselves and this has more than a whiff of Monty Python about it. You can't have it both ways.

    If mining truly is as dangerous as you claim, Margaret Thatcher and the Conservatives did you a favour. You should be thanking them.
    So by your analogy, if driving is that dangerous, then you should be thanking (non-driver) Gordon Brown for taxing all the drivers off the road to save them from the carnage ?

    Mining IS dangerous. There is little doubt about that. Even your own figures above back it up. Did Margaret Thatcher do the miners a favour ?

    Well, given a choice, most people would prefer NOT to work down a mine. However, there are communities up and down the UK that would not exist were it not for the mines. Huge sprawling communities grew up around them over the last 300 years.

    Most people would prefer to work for a living, to provide for their families. If the only occupation available to them just happened to be a dangerous one (like mining), they will still choose to do that occupation and earn a crust for their family.

    When Thatcher closed the mines down, she left large areas of the country with no other way of earning a living. Counting buttons on a factory line earning less than a fifth of what you were earning does not count (when you have a mortage to pay). She removed the ability (and the dignity) of most of the population in those areas to be able to look after them and theirs. The result being that all of a sudden, thousands more were left looking for work in an area where there was none, giving the State a huge surge in people suddenly claiming benefits. Many of those never found work again. Also, those that did own their own homes found that they spiralled down in value because nobody wanted to move there due to there being no work. They could have commuted into the Cities of course, but in many cases it was hard to even do that as Beeching had closed down most of the Railways in their area in the 60's. Add to that the fact that the bus companies had also been sold off and you had a better chance of seeing a UFO in those areas than you were to get a viable bus service (if one existed at all). Then of course, those who drive down into the Cities created another problem of traffic congestion in those cities that never existed before as the work was previously spread all over the place. Those that did found that the only thing they could do was to move abroad where their skills were still valued in places like Australia, South Africa, USA etc. I know of quite a few who did that. Maybe they were the wise ones ?

    Don't you remember the TV character Yosser Hughes and his immortal line 'Gis a job, I can do that !!' ? He was not merely a fiction of imagination, he was based on countless REAL people out there.

    It is not by accident that some of the most depressed areas in Britain are still those that have always traditionally been mining communities.

    Add onto that the Steelworkers (Thatcher sold British Steel to private companies which means that it is now owned by the Chinese, via the Dutch) who proceeded to close down the majority of the Steel Plants. Then there is the shipyards, the railways (what mess they are since being privatised) etc etc and you get the picture.

    It's no coincidence that crime, poverty and depravation rose in those communities whilst those living in the Tory favoured areas proceeded to make shedloads of money on the back of that, thus creating the odious 'Loadsamoney' character that Harry Enfield famously pilloried in his comedy sketches.

    Some of those areas have only really recovered from that in the last 10 years or so (Glasgow being a good example). Some of them are still trying to recover from the effects of that.

    All Thatcher did was invest millions in bringing in foreign companies to bridge the gap in some (but not all) of these areas, wooing them with grants. These companies took full advantage of the free rent and ready-made building provided to them by that policy, only to then bugger off to somewhere else where the labour was cheaper as soon as the life of the grants and incentives given to them ran out.

    Comment


    • Re: General Election 2010 Thread

      Very valid comments Jester which strike a cord with me.

      I also remember the comment by Tebbit who said something along the likes of "get on your bike".

      That comment by Tebbit epitomised the divide in the country and the lack of concern.

      Comment


      • Re: General Election 2010 Thread

        Originally posted by WendyB View Post
        Good point Sapph. Cos let's face it, no-one actually voted for Gordon did they? People voted for the Labour Party, or probably more specifically, at the time, for Tony Blair. Then, 10 years later, our Tone hands over the Leadership to Gordon. No leadership election, no consultation, just a few dodgy deals and a handshake in a curry house somewhere (do forgive me if I've got the place wrong....so many dodgy deals in so many different places). Sort of goes against all my ideas of democracy......So not much point in voting for a person, is there, as you may not end up with that person after all.
        If memory serves me correctly, didn't John Major also come to power in the same way as a result of Thatcher stepping down ?

        Comment


        • Re: General Election 2010 Thread

          Originally posted by Jester View Post
          If memory serves me correctly, didn't John Major also come to power in the same way as a result of Thatcher stepping down ?
          You are correct.

          The same is true of Alexander Douglas-Home.:tinysmile_aha_t:

          An interesting issue for debate would be whether it is right to have unelected members of the cabinet. A lot of people have genuine concerns about that.
          Last edited by orc; 22nd April 2010, 09:49:AM.

          Comment


          • Re: General Election 2010 Thread

            Originally posted by Jester View Post
            If memory serves me correctly, didn't John Major also come to power in the same way as a result of Thatcher stepping down ?
            With respect, John Major won the second ballot of his MP's and Gordon Brown was effectively heir apparent. I don't think you can use the John Major analogy against WendyB's post. It's not the same since Tony Blair did not get the push or was challenged during his leadership.

            Apologies Orc, I can't comment on Douglas-Hume cos I am too young to remember it

            Comment


            • Re: General Election 2010 Thread

              Originally posted by natweststaffmember View Post
              With respect, John Major won the second ballot of his MP's and Gordon Brown was effectively heir apparent. I don't think you can use the John Major analogy against WendyB's post. It's not the same since Tony Blair did not get the push or was challenged during his leadership.

              Apologies Orc, I can't comment on Douglas-Hume cos I am too young to remember it
              As far as I remember, John Major was elected from within the party when Maggie stepped down, not just wheeled in without so much as a by-your-leave. But if he had got in in the same way as Gordon, and Alex Douglas Hume, then it just proves my point, doesn't it? That there's no point voting for a person (no matter which party they belong to) cos they may not be the one you end up with.
              And of course,John Smith died and had to be replaced, but that's not quite the same because he wasn't Prime Minister at the time.

              My original post wasn't meant to be against labour, it was just a general observation.
              I actually believe that you should vote on the party's manifesto etc, and whether or not you believe they will actually carry out their pledges and promises, but obviously the person they have leading them will have an influence on how much you believe them in the first place, depending on how well he puts the ideas across etc and how much conviction/charisma/trustworthiness he portrays.


              I think it's time we all watched Brewsters Millions and voted for "None of the Above"
              Is no longer here

              Comment


              • Re: General Election 2010 Thread

                Wendy / Nattie,

                Wasn't quite what I was getting at. What I meant, as a response to the comment, was that at the time John Major had not been voted for by the electorate either. The electorate had voted for Thatcher.

                Granted, he did then win the ensuing election when it came. GB has not had that opportunity yet.

                Anyway, I didn't take it as an anti-Labour rant, it simply occurred to me that John Major had gotten to lead the country in 'similar' circumstances. I wasn't aware that Douglas-Hulme had done the same.

                Given that we have only had Labour or Tory leaders since pretty much the outset of the 20th Century, there wasn't much likelihood of finding anyone other than a Labour or Tory Leader in that category anyway !!

                Furthermore, people seem to be under the impression that I am pro-Labour, when it actual fact I have not yet made up my mind who I am going to vote for. I just know it will NOT be the Tories and neither will it be Plaid Cymru !!

                Comment


                • Re: General Election 2010 Thread

                  Exactly my point in my post #116 Wends, to be quite honest I am sick to death of hearing about what person wears what, or whose wife is the best looking or who is going to have another child.

                  Comment


                  • Re: General Election 2010 Thread

                    Jester, I thought all along that you were agreeing with me, and had used Major to illustrate that, I didn't think it was meant as any sort of a rant.

                    I haven't made my mind up either yet, except that I know it won't be the BNP or the Greens or SNP. or Plaid Cymru
                    Is no longer here

                    Comment


                    • Re: General Election 2010 Thread

                      Originally posted by natweststaffmember View Post
                      With respect, John Major won the second ballot of his MP's and Gordon Brown was effectively heir apparent. I don't think you can use the John Major analogy against WendyB's post. It's not the same since Tony Blair did not get the push or was challenged during his leadership.

                      Apologies Orc, I can't comment on Douglas-Hume cos I am too young to remember it
                      I was only 3 (honest), so don't remember when he took over the reigns from MacMillan, who resigned due to the sex scandals- Profumo etc, but claimed illness.

                      I had to look the following up and its quite interesting, highlighting the Tory old boy network, beloved of the time and possibly still is.

                      The Tories had no procedure in place for such an event- the sudden resignation, there was no depute at the time and the leading contenter (amongst the Tory MPs) Rab Butler was not wanted by MacMillan and the establishment.

                      At the time MacMillan resigned, Home was not even elected as an MP, being a Lord, which he renounced (due to the legislation designed to help Tony Benn renounce his seat) and fought a safe by election in Perth and became an MP. For a 2 week period he was neither a Lord or an MP, but was the Prime Minister.

                      There had been talk of him being Prime Minister whislt a Lord, but they agreed the above course of action.

                      That seems quite remarkable for being so recent in our history. I hope the likes of it never happens again.



                      We also forgot to mention Jim Callaghan who took over mid term when Wilson resigned as PM in the mid 70's.
                      Last edited by orc; 22nd April 2010, 13:26:PM.

                      Comment


                      • Re: General Election 2010 Thread

                        .....and lost the election. You gotta give John Major his dues, he appears to be the only one who did win an election after taking over as PM mid way through a parliament...

                        Comment


                        • Re: General Election 2010 Thread

                          Originally posted by Jester View Post
                          Granted, he did then win the ensuing election when it came. GB has not had that opportunity yet.
                          That is all his own doing, he could have had the opportunity to find out if people really wanted him as a Prime Minister in 2007, instead he baulked at the thought losing.

                          Comment


                          • Re: General Election 2010 Thread

                            Well, it was a Major surprise (pun intended) when JM won that election then as most polls had him miles behind Kinnock !!

                            Comment


                            • Re: General Election 2010 Thread

                              Originally posted by Amy View Post
                              That is all his own doing, he could have had the opportunity to find out if people really wanted him as a Prime Minister in 2007, instead he baulked at the thought losing.
                              That is so very, very true and he will severely regret that lack of decision making regardless of the outcome of this election as very the best I think he can hope for is leading a hung parliament in coalition with the liberals/ other parties.

                              He would probably have won in 2007, before the banking crisis and subsequent economic disaster.

                              Comment


                              • Re: General Election 2010 Thread

                                anyone watching the debate on Sky News or CNN?

                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                                Working...
                                X