jaguarsuk thank you.
Below is my draft defence. It took me a while to get my head around it hence the delay. I appreciate the tight timescale but I am looking to post this by Monday afternoon so would be very grateful for some advice/critique beforehand.
In the Northampton County Court Business Centre
Claim No: ***
DEFENCE
1.The Defendant received the claim *** from the Northampton County Court on ****.
2.The Claimants statement of case states that the account was assigned from *** to Lowell Portfolio I LTD on **/**/2015. The Defendant does not recall receiving notice of this assignment.
(The following points 3-5 have been highlighted as I am unsure whether I need all or just part of this?)
3.On **/**/2019 the Defendant sent a request for inspection of documents mentioned in the claimant’s statement of case under Civil Procedure Rule 31.14 to Lowell Solicitors LTD. The Defendant requested the Claimant provide copies of: 1. The agreement for a ***(Current Account) under reference *** ('the Agreement’) 2. Notice given to the defendant by *** that the agreement was later assigned to the claimant on **/**/2015.
4.Lowell Solicitors LTD has not sent the required documents to the Defendant.
5.On the [Date] The Defendant sent a formal request for a copy of the original agreement to Lowell Solicitors LTD pursuant to section [77 or 78] of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 along with the statutory £1 fee.
6.Under Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) Where the claim includes a money claim, a defendant shall be taken to require that any allegation relating to the amount of money claimed be proved unless he expressly admits the allegation. Therefore, it is expected that the Claimant be required to prove the allegation that the money is owed as claimed.
7.Lowell Solicitors LTD have refused to provide the Defendant with a copy of the agreement in response to the CPR 31.14 request filed on **.**.2019.
8.In the absence of an agreement Lowell Solicitors LTD is unable to demonstrate offer, acceptance and therefore formation of a simple contract between the Defendant and ***.
9.Pursuant to The Law of Property Act 1925 s.136 Lowell Solicitors LTD are yet to demonstrate the bank fulfilled their obligations as assignor of the alleged debt by issuing a Notice of Assignment, therefore the claimant has yet to demonstrate their legal right to bring the claim.
10.By providing only copies of their Notices of Assignment as assignee, Lowell Solicitors LTD have not fulfilled their obligations of CPR 31.14 regards to the Defendant’s request.
11.The Defendant respectfully requests the court orders the Claimants to provide the necessary documentation in order for The Defendant to fully plead his case else the Claim should stand struck out.
12.In the event that the relevant documents are received from the Claimant, the Defendant will then be in a position to amend his defence, and would ask that the Claimants bear the costs of the amendment.
13.Should the relevant documents not be provided by the Claimant, the Defendant respectfully inquires as to how the Court can rule on the terms of any agreement without being able to see what those terms were, and whether any terms of any alleged contract have been breached.
14.It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief as claimed or at all.
Regarding the above - do I need to add any further information in or is what I've written sufficient?
Thanks in advance for any and all advice provided.
Below is my draft defence. It took me a while to get my head around it hence the delay. I appreciate the tight timescale but I am looking to post this by Monday afternoon so would be very grateful for some advice/critique beforehand.
In the Northampton County Court Business Centre
Claim No: ***
DEFENCE
1.The Defendant received the claim *** from the Northampton County Court on ****.
2.The Claimants statement of case states that the account was assigned from *** to Lowell Portfolio I LTD on **/**/2015. The Defendant does not recall receiving notice of this assignment.
(The following points 3-5 have been highlighted as I am unsure whether I need all or just part of this?)
3.On **/**/2019 the Defendant sent a request for inspection of documents mentioned in the claimant’s statement of case under Civil Procedure Rule 31.14 to Lowell Solicitors LTD. The Defendant requested the Claimant provide copies of: 1. The agreement for a ***(Current Account) under reference *** ('the Agreement’) 2. Notice given to the defendant by *** that the agreement was later assigned to the claimant on **/**/2015.
4.Lowell Solicitors LTD has not sent the required documents to the Defendant.
5.On the [Date] The Defendant sent a formal request for a copy of the original agreement to Lowell Solicitors LTD pursuant to section [77 or 78] of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 along with the statutory £1 fee.
6.Under Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) Where the claim includes a money claim, a defendant shall be taken to require that any allegation relating to the amount of money claimed be proved unless he expressly admits the allegation. Therefore, it is expected that the Claimant be required to prove the allegation that the money is owed as claimed.
7.Lowell Solicitors LTD have refused to provide the Defendant with a copy of the agreement in response to the CPR 31.14 request filed on **.**.2019.
8.In the absence of an agreement Lowell Solicitors LTD is unable to demonstrate offer, acceptance and therefore formation of a simple contract between the Defendant and ***.
9.Pursuant to The Law of Property Act 1925 s.136 Lowell Solicitors LTD are yet to demonstrate the bank fulfilled their obligations as assignor of the alleged debt by issuing a Notice of Assignment, therefore the claimant has yet to demonstrate their legal right to bring the claim.
10.By providing only copies of their Notices of Assignment as assignee, Lowell Solicitors LTD have not fulfilled their obligations of CPR 31.14 regards to the Defendant’s request.
11.The Defendant respectfully requests the court orders the Claimants to provide the necessary documentation in order for The Defendant to fully plead his case else the Claim should stand struck out.
12.In the event that the relevant documents are received from the Claimant, the Defendant will then be in a position to amend his defence, and would ask that the Claimants bear the costs of the amendment.
13.Should the relevant documents not be provided by the Claimant, the Defendant respectfully inquires as to how the Court can rule on the terms of any agreement without being able to see what those terms were, and whether any terms of any alleged contract have been breached.
14.It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief as claimed or at all.
Originally posted by jaguarsuk
View Post
Regarding the above - do I need to add any further information in or is what I've written sufficient?
Thanks in advance for any and all advice provided.
Comment