Hi,
i was looking for some advice on a claim I am trying to resolve for my dad. In 1998 he took a loan out which he was adamant did not have ppi on. Well it turns out he did so he made a claim and it appears when they phoned him to go through this he answered all but one question stating he had no knowledge of the ppi being on his loan and he advized the advisor he did not want or need it.
It appears on one question he has become confused and stated he just signed the insurance documents which resulted in them giving him a offer of a partial refund which was the difference between a premium policy and a single policy. When I called to challenge the decision they advised he would of signed the documents and he should of known he had ppi. On this I challenged them to retrieve the documentation and prove he had done this. Long behold they could not produce this so changed tact to say because he answered one question slightly different then he was not entitled to a full refund. On this I advised RBS my dad becomes easily confused due to the medication he is on for various issues to which they said I had to prove.
Now I am damned if I am going to be beaten by these con artists as at the time when my dad got the loan he was in a dark place which they used to there advantage. They are now trying again to take advantage of an older person by confusing him and doing him out of money he rightly deserves.
Just on a side note I have asked them to provide me a full transcript of the call including a letter stating they are unable to prove that my dad signed the documentation for ppi.
Has anyone got any advice on what a toon I should take next?
appreciate any help on this!
James
i was looking for some advice on a claim I am trying to resolve for my dad. In 1998 he took a loan out which he was adamant did not have ppi on. Well it turns out he did so he made a claim and it appears when they phoned him to go through this he answered all but one question stating he had no knowledge of the ppi being on his loan and he advized the advisor he did not want or need it.
It appears on one question he has become confused and stated he just signed the insurance documents which resulted in them giving him a offer of a partial refund which was the difference between a premium policy and a single policy. When I called to challenge the decision they advised he would of signed the documents and he should of known he had ppi. On this I challenged them to retrieve the documentation and prove he had done this. Long behold they could not produce this so changed tact to say because he answered one question slightly different then he was not entitled to a full refund. On this I advised RBS my dad becomes easily confused due to the medication he is on for various issues to which they said I had to prove.
Now I am damned if I am going to be beaten by these con artists as at the time when my dad got the loan he was in a dark place which they used to there advantage. They are now trying again to take advantage of an older person by confusing him and doing him out of money he rightly deserves.
Just on a side note I have asked them to provide me a full transcript of the call including a letter stating they are unable to prove that my dad signed the documentation for ppi.
Has anyone got any advice on what a toon I should take next?
appreciate any help on this!
James
Comment