I have named a few of the business in the subject line, because the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) Adjudicator are still investigating the relationships of the insurer to all involved.
The broker was Click Finance - dissolved in 2006, they do though have other Click Businesses, such as loans, mortgages and so on, and the same Managing director as well and other head staff.
Marshallka had spent a lot of time over at MSE on this one, and it first started about 2008.
As the broker dissolved, I could not make Endeavour liable either, but paperwork we did receive was administered by HFC as well as the brokers paperwork.
The only information I do have on the insurer Hamilton is the PPI policy details.
I am unable to go the Finanical compensation Scheme (FSCS) because when we taken out the loan in 2004, the broker was not regulated, yet HFC were, and the FOS have suggested to people in the same position as myself to go the underwriter direction.
But to do this they have to see what involvement these had in the sale of the ppi.
I have some underwriters paperwork called a Customer Speaks with Form that was completed by HFC bank and both me and hubby have separate ones, we recall on speaking to them before the loan went ahead.
Click Finance arranged the loan but the loan had to be dealt with by HFC, or should I say the insurance, so me and hubby had to speak to these separately before the loan was accepted and paid out.
So, even though the adjudicator is trying to pursue Hamilton, I do think it should be HFC and not them.
All because the adjudicator says HFC have already claimed they have nothing to do with it, they would say that wouldn't they, and its only something Hamilton will say too.
The broker was Click Finance - dissolved in 2006, they do though have other Click Businesses, such as loans, mortgages and so on, and the same Managing director as well and other head staff.
Marshallka had spent a lot of time over at MSE on this one, and it first started about 2008.
As the broker dissolved, I could not make Endeavour liable either, but paperwork we did receive was administered by HFC as well as the brokers paperwork.
The only information I do have on the insurer Hamilton is the PPI policy details.
I am unable to go the Finanical compensation Scheme (FSCS) because when we taken out the loan in 2004, the broker was not regulated, yet HFC were, and the FOS have suggested to people in the same position as myself to go the underwriter direction.
But to do this they have to see what involvement these had in the sale of the ppi.
I have some underwriters paperwork called a Customer Speaks with Form that was completed by HFC bank and both me and hubby have separate ones, we recall on speaking to them before the loan went ahead.
Click Finance arranged the loan but the loan had to be dealt with by HFC, or should I say the insurance, so me and hubby had to speak to these separately before the loan was accepted and paid out.
So, even though the adjudicator is trying to pursue Hamilton, I do think it should be HFC and not them.
All because the adjudicator says HFC have already claimed they have nothing to do with it, they would say that wouldn't they, and its only something Hamilton will say too.
Comment