Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
I will agree that the scale the industry reached in 2009/10 will never be achieved again and that justice doesn't seem to exist in this industry, just look at the two massive judgements that went against it, bank charges and s78 ruling by Waksman.
My question is this, should the BBA get the review, we expect the FSA and FOS to appeal... Should the review go ahead and go in favour of the BBA what is the worst that could happen?
Am I correct in saying a waiver such as that implemented during the bank charge "fiasco" could be imposed once a review has been granted? - Is this what the banks/lenders are (excuse the pun) banking on?
Here is food for thought, surely Mr Justice Ouseley must see that what the BBA is trying to do is not being agreed by all, ie Santander (and a few others it appears from reading on here). Surely that must have some impact on things if the judgement was not already written prior to hearing.
NLP states its time to move on and working in the industry I am always looking for the next claim, not just against bank/lenders/insurers, but why does it appear all new avenues/claims come back aginst these company's? is it? -
- because its money, and clients are passionate to get this back
- because these organisations are so corrupt and it is easier to find the next claim against them
- because there is not many other claims out there that will generate the revenue the cmc's require
I won't be throwing in the towel just yet as I think there is still money to be retrieved from these organisations. I have always said you have to be working on the next claim.
I will agree that the scale the industry reached in 2009/10 will never be achieved again and that justice doesn't seem to exist in this industry, just look at the two massive judgements that went against it, bank charges and s78 ruling by Waksman.
My question is this, should the BBA get the review, we expect the FSA and FOS to appeal... Should the review go ahead and go in favour of the BBA what is the worst that could happen?
Am I correct in saying a waiver such as that implemented during the bank charge "fiasco" could be imposed once a review has been granted? - Is this what the banks/lenders are (excuse the pun) banking on?
Here is food for thought, surely Mr Justice Ouseley must see that what the BBA is trying to do is not being agreed by all, ie Santander (and a few others it appears from reading on here). Surely that must have some impact on things if the judgement was not already written prior to hearing.
NLP states its time to move on and working in the industry I am always looking for the next claim, not just against bank/lenders/insurers, but why does it appear all new avenues/claims come back aginst these company's? is it? -
- because its money, and clients are passionate to get this back
- because these organisations are so corrupt and it is easier to find the next claim against them
- because there is not many other claims out there that will generate the revenue the cmc's require
I won't be throwing in the towel just yet as I think there is still money to be retrieved from these organisations. I have always said you have to be working on the next claim.
Comment