Re: First Right of Appropriation...offsetting debt against benefits RBS
Ame and myself have discussed this much of the day, I think the direction Ame is taking this is spot on.
My suggestions are that once Ame is happy with the discussions she has been in with the banks , mainly RBS, Barclays and Nationwide have been exhausted and concluded that she then takes it a step further.
Clarify the position as to whether the common law right of appropriation overrides the banks terms and conditions regarding offsetting funds against overdrafts/debts to the bank. If this is the case then make enquiries with the OFT as to if the term of offset can be regarded as unfair in its current state or whether there should be investigations/recommendations made to vary that term to include the consumers FROA and therefore redress the imbalance (Regulation 4 UTCCR 1999).
Contact the DWP namely Kitty Ussher with her findings with a view to lobbying parliament to reform/instigate/implement the inalienabilty of Social Security Benefit Payments so they cannot be taken from an account holder without their express agreement.
Among the list of her areas are :-
She would be an ideal minister to approach about FROA and Benefit Inalienabilty.
RBS have already conceeded that FROA would be used if the consumer so requests it in the correct manner. They now need to, as Ame says, make their staff at branch and customer contact centres more aware of this.
Ame and myself have discussed this much of the day, I think the direction Ame is taking this is spot on.
My suggestions are that once Ame is happy with the discussions she has been in with the banks , mainly RBS, Barclays and Nationwide have been exhausted and concluded that she then takes it a step further.
Clarify the position as to whether the common law right of appropriation overrides the banks terms and conditions regarding offsetting funds against overdrafts/debts to the bank. If this is the case then make enquiries with the OFT as to if the term of offset can be regarded as unfair in its current state or whether there should be investigations/recommendations made to vary that term to include the consumers FROA and therefore redress the imbalance (Regulation 4 UTCCR 1999).
Contact the DWP namely Kitty Ussher with her findings with a view to lobbying parliament to reform/instigate/implement the inalienabilty of Social Security Benefit Payments so they cannot be taken from an account holder without their express agreement.
Among the list of her areas are :-
- Financial Inclusion
- Debt Management
- Methods of Payment Reform
- Benefit Simplification
- Housing and Council Tax Benefit policy and delivery
- Social Security Advisory Committee
She would be an ideal minister to approach about FROA and Benefit Inalienabilty.
RBS have already conceeded that FROA would be used if the consumer so requests it in the correct manner. They now need to, as Ame says, make their staff at branch and customer contact centres more aware of this.
Comment