Re: Sainsbury's Bank Plc(HBOS) And Four Debt Collection Companies Against An Individu
Hello and good evening Cetelco and thank you for your entry and comments.
RE: F+F SETTLEMENTS.
The terms in my offer of settlement were precise, and Sainsbury's knew if not acceptable as settlement they were to return the payment.(Fact) Sainsbury's did not mindlessly bank the said cheque.
Any regulated lender/creditor who banks a cheque in full and final settlement but does not accept the terms and fails to swiftly reject the payment as a settlement, will have signified acceptance of the payment as discharge of the debt.(Fact-case law)
Where other creditors are accepting settlements and the payment is from a third party, the conduct of the creditor behaving such as Sainsbury's did, will be taken/seen as a fraud on the other creditors and the third party payer!(Fact-case law)
My harrassment case against Sainsbury's will use all that it contains within it that is comprehensively comparable to all those cases in full and final settlement that have been successfull to the claimant/persons/debtors who had paid their creditors with a settlement payment and then pursued by the creditor for the balance.
Sainsbury's were deceitfull, underhand, dishonest, inconsiderate, unreasonable and unfair in relation to their conduct to the full and final settlement. they induced me into believing that the settlement payment had been accepted, as they did not return the payment and they did not reject it, nor the terms the said cheque was tendered by.
Is there anyone on this site who is a judge, if not, are some of you people stating to me that your knowledge and wisdom has superiority over the lords who reside in the Courts Of Justice of this England?
Many Thanks
Godzilla.
Hello and good evening Cetelco and thank you for your entry and comments.
RE: F+F SETTLEMENTS.
The terms in my offer of settlement were precise, and Sainsbury's knew if not acceptable as settlement they were to return the payment.(Fact) Sainsbury's did not mindlessly bank the said cheque.
Any regulated lender/creditor who banks a cheque in full and final settlement but does not accept the terms and fails to swiftly reject the payment as a settlement, will have signified acceptance of the payment as discharge of the debt.(Fact-case law)
Where other creditors are accepting settlements and the payment is from a third party, the conduct of the creditor behaving such as Sainsbury's did, will be taken/seen as a fraud on the other creditors and the third party payer!(Fact-case law)
My harrassment case against Sainsbury's will use all that it contains within it that is comprehensively comparable to all those cases in full and final settlement that have been successfull to the claimant/persons/debtors who had paid their creditors with a settlement payment and then pursued by the creditor for the balance.
Sainsbury's were deceitfull, underhand, dishonest, inconsiderate, unreasonable and unfair in relation to their conduct to the full and final settlement. they induced me into believing that the settlement payment had been accepted, as they did not return the payment and they did not reject it, nor the terms the said cheque was tendered by.
Is there anyone on this site who is a judge, if not, are some of you people stating to me that your knowledge and wisdom has superiority over the lords who reside in the Courts Of Justice of this England?
Many Thanks
Godzilla.
Comment