Re: welcome finance help needed
January 31, 2009
Welcome financial Services Limited
Mere way
Ruddington Fields Business Park
Nottingham
NG11 6NZ
Acc No: Anonymous
Dear Sir or Madam:
We have been looking at our agreement with you, reference above and have noted that we purchased payment protection insurance from you. We are of the belief that we were mis-sold this policy due to your agent stating that we would not get the loan without taking the payment protection insurance. It was also stated that if we took the payment protection insurance then it would assist us in our application to get any future credit from welcome finance.
Your agent also stated that we would receive all documentation relating to the payment protection policy in the post in the 4 weeks following our signing the agreement and that all information regarding what the policy covered and did not cover. We were also assured that we were both covered under the policy because it was a joint loan.
Having recently looked at the paperwork for our joint loan, we have discovered that only my husband was covered under the payment protection insurance policy and we have never received any paperwork relating to the payment protection policy so we are not aware of which insurance company the policy is with and what the policy covers or does not cover.
We are writing to you for justification that the policy was suitable for us based on our circumstances and an explanation as to how your suitability criteria works. If you cannot justify this to our satisfaction then we request a full refund of all payments made to date as well as interest on these payments.
As we believe we have been deprived of this money, we also expect an interest element to be added to each sum at a suitable rate and using a suitable calculation method, as a compensatory gesture.
In respect of cancellation of a policy, may I draw to your attention the following reports from FSA, namely “The sale of payment Protection Insurance – results of thematic work, November 2005” & “The sale of Payment Protection Insurance – results of follow up thematic work, October 2006” that state “When consumers cancel the PPI without repaying the loan, some firms will need to re-issue the loan without the PPI. Firms should ensure they treat their customers fairly in relation to the terms on which they re-issue the loan”. This means that any new loan is on the same or better terms and does not detriment us in any way and that this is to be done without making new search on our credit file.
We expect a swift response to this letter within 14days, containing either your full justification or notice that you will be refunding these payments.
If we do not receive a satisfactory response then we will issue another letter notifying you of our intention to take further action if the matter is not resolved within a further 14days. After this limit has passed, we will be either contacting the Financial Ombudsman to investigate our complaint or issuing court proceedings.
Yours faithfully
------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
I am going upwards (this time) It just seems an odd way of putting it on the statement
Why put dr and cr and cr and balance - when the balance does not change.
Large fee £1885.00 !
January 31, 2009
Welcome financial Services Limited
Mere way
Ruddington Fields Business Park
Nottingham
NG11 6NZ
Acc No: Anonymous
Dear Sir or Madam:
We have been looking at our agreement with you, reference above and have noted that we purchased payment protection insurance from you. We are of the belief that we were mis-sold this policy due to your agent stating that we would not get the loan without taking the payment protection insurance. It was also stated that if we took the payment protection insurance then it would assist us in our application to get any future credit from welcome finance.
Your agent also stated that we would receive all documentation relating to the payment protection policy in the post in the 4 weeks following our signing the agreement and that all information regarding what the policy covered and did not cover. We were also assured that we were both covered under the policy because it was a joint loan.
Having recently looked at the paperwork for our joint loan, we have discovered that only my husband was covered under the payment protection insurance policy and we have never received any paperwork relating to the payment protection policy so we are not aware of which insurance company the policy is with and what the policy covers or does not cover.
We are writing to you for justification that the policy was suitable for us based on our circumstances and an explanation as to how your suitability criteria works. If you cannot justify this to our satisfaction then we request a full refund of all payments made to date as well as interest on these payments.
As we believe we have been deprived of this money, we also expect an interest element to be added to each sum at a suitable rate and using a suitable calculation method, as a compensatory gesture.
In respect of cancellation of a policy, may I draw to your attention the following reports from FSA, namely “The sale of payment Protection Insurance – results of thematic work, November 2005” & “The sale of Payment Protection Insurance – results of follow up thematic work, October 2006” that state “When consumers cancel the PPI without repaying the loan, some firms will need to re-issue the loan without the PPI. Firms should ensure they treat their customers fairly in relation to the terms on which they re-issue the loan”. This means that any new loan is on the same or better terms and does not detriment us in any way and that this is to be done without making new search on our credit file.
We expect a swift response to this letter within 14days, containing either your full justification or notice that you will be refunding these payments.
If we do not receive a satisfactory response then we will issue another letter notifying you of our intention to take further action if the matter is not resolved within a further 14days. After this limit has passed, we will be either contacting the Financial Ombudsman to investigate our complaint or issuing court proceedings.
Yours faithfully
------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
Originally posted by enaid
View Post
I am going upwards (this time) It just seems an odd way of putting it on the statement
Why put dr and cr and cr and balance - when the balance does not change.
Large fee £1885.00 !
Comment