Back in April I received one of those 30 day reply letters regarding a catalogue debt and I replied asking for more information. They wrote back saying account was on hold while they provided the info and I hadn't heard from them until recently again. They enclosed notice of assignment, statements for duration of the account, true copy of my credit agreement (which i am not sure is really classed as a true copy as it is just a photocopy of terms and conditions and has small signature on behalf of the catalogue company and obviously nothing in my signature box). They go onto say they cannot provide a copy of the Default Notice as they claim it was sent direct to me but they have enclosed a sheet shot of their system showing when the default notice was sent.
My question is can a screenshot of someone's system represent proof of a Default Notice?
They say they intend to rely on all this documentation in support of their claim if we go to court.
Any advice by someone more knowledgeable in this field will be great. Can put up pics of this letter and attachments if needed.
My question is can a screenshot of someone's system represent proof of a Default Notice?
They say they intend to rely on all this documentation in support of their claim if we go to court.
Any advice by someone more knowledgeable in this field will be great. Can put up pics of this letter and attachments if needed.
Comment