Hi all. Newbie so please be gentle.
I have a query that I would very much like to share / advice on please.
I am currently trying to reclaim my charges from Littlewoods (Shop Direct)
After many letters backwards and forward and their continual refuse to play ball, I have ended up taking the matter down the MCOL route.
Since going down this route Littlewoods have passed the matter over to one of their legal guys from their own legal dept. He has written to me and paid a cheque repaying all my charges and the court fee however he states I am NOT entitled to interest as the account was based on an interest free basis, and that if I were to pursue the matter further then the defendant would argue that any award of stat int would amount to my unjust enrichment and an unfair punishment of the defendant for my contract breaches.
Now does this guys spiel hold any water ? As the way I see it the 8% is an award for the unfair charges that they have applied to my account and thereofre money which I have not had and couldve been placed elsewhere.
Now from reading many posts on here I am aware that the no agreement would actually be in force legally as I have not signed anything and it wouldve been a blanket one that they wouldve applied (which obviously does not comply with the CCA)
I am proposing to write him again disagreeing with what he says as I feel the 8% is dependant on a Judges discretion but am NOT aware of any case where a Judge has NOT awarded 8%. Is there any case law anybody is aware of that I can quote in my letter which is sortve relevant and backs me up. ?
I have a query that I would very much like to share / advice on please.
I am currently trying to reclaim my charges from Littlewoods (Shop Direct)
After many letters backwards and forward and their continual refuse to play ball, I have ended up taking the matter down the MCOL route.
Since going down this route Littlewoods have passed the matter over to one of their legal guys from their own legal dept. He has written to me and paid a cheque repaying all my charges and the court fee however he states I am NOT entitled to interest as the account was based on an interest free basis, and that if I were to pursue the matter further then the defendant would argue that any award of stat int would amount to my unjust enrichment and an unfair punishment of the defendant for my contract breaches.
Now does this guys spiel hold any water ? As the way I see it the 8% is an award for the unfair charges that they have applied to my account and thereofre money which I have not had and couldve been placed elsewhere.
Now from reading many posts on here I am aware that the no agreement would actually be in force legally as I have not signed anything and it wouldve been a blanket one that they wouldve applied (which obviously does not comply with the CCA)
I am proposing to write him again disagreeing with what he says as I feel the 8% is dependant on a Judges discretion but am NOT aware of any case where a Judge has NOT awarded 8%. Is there any case law anybody is aware of that I can quote in my letter which is sortve relevant and backs me up. ?
Comment