I've separated this issue from the main Swift Advances thread because I thinkn disussing this issue in amonst the rest will confuse things
Sparkie
EQUIFAX LTD. CRA
.“Each Equifax client is required to sign a contract prior to gaining access to our system. This contract stipulates that the client in question must seek consent, from the individual concerned, prior to supplying Equifax with insight information. Equifax works closely with our clients to ensure that they fully understand this requirement which is specified under the current Data Protection Act. It is the responsibility of the client in question to ensure that this consent is sought and that appropriate records are maintained to substantiate each account supplied to Equifax.”
I posted this on the Swift Advances plc thread…but I think as this points to problems for & with the CRA’s Callcredit and Equifax. I decided to start a new thread solely devoted to .this……I’m going to disect the statement above as follows, and, for these reasons stated.
Swift Advances plc do have a data controllers licence….but….
There are no other names stated on this licence indicating that they will supply data under no other name than Swift Advances plc.
First off…….“Each Equifax client is required to sign a contract prior to gaining access to our system.
Swift Advances plc will/should have signed the above mentioned contract, this should match their data controllers licence.
That would allow Swift Advances plc to access the CRA’s data base under the stated name to supply information and data and carry out searches on credit files………….only under that name.
Everyone knows that it has been discovered that the CRA Equifax data base is accessed and information is supplied by “Swift Group” about agreements entered into by borrowers with Swift Advances plc.
1…Swift Group, are an unrecognised body
2...Swift Group, up until 6th October 2010 were an unlicensed trading name.
3…Swift Group, could not and did hold their own data controllers licence, that would give that name/entity the authority to provide data and information to third parties and that includes the CRA’s.
4…The information supplied to the CRA’s by Swift Group is information about the account under and related to a consumer credit agreement, it matters not what type of consumer credit agreement all that matters is that it is a consumer credit agreement.
5…This would be in law construed not as conducting actual consumer credit business, but, as conducting consumer credit related business.
6…Under Section 39 (1) Conducting consumer credit business or consumer credit related business for which a CCA licence is required is a criminal offence, furthermore under section 39(2)a licensee who uses a name to conduct consumer credit business or consumer credit business that is not on said licence commits a criminal offence.
7…To access the CRA data bases and supply information the supplier has to have signed the contract with the CRA allowing that access. ( All CRA’s require this contract to be signed by said supplier of data)
8…Swift Group have no such contract in place with Equifax the CRA they supply data to, only Swift Advances plc have signed such contract ….but Swift Advances plc are not the suppliers of any of the information that is supplied to & held by the CRA Equifax.
9…I have questioned Equifax about all these issues and supplied them with many documents as evidence that Equifax are in complete breach of the DPA by initially accepting data from
a) an unrecognised body and;
b) an unlicensed trading name; and further more, continuing to accept data from a trading name that is not included in the contract initially signed by Swift Advances plc and which is not named in their own Data Controllers specific licence.
Callcredit Ltd CRA
Everything above applies to Callcredit……………Except……..the supplier of the data and information to them is “Swift Advances”.
So where in the above instead of “Swift Group” insert and read….. “Swift Advances”.
Questions I leave everyone with over all this……………….It is Swift Advances plc that hold the CCA licence…………it is Swift Advances plc that hold the data controllers licence ……but as seen it not under that name that all this information is supplied to the CRA’s……….why not? Why do they supply the two different CRA’s with the same information under two different unlicensed names?
Why? When it comes to the search, that is made on a customers credit file to check on their credit status on default of the agreement with Swift Advances plc. They search under the name of Swift Advances plc.
The search record states the reason for the search as “ Debt Collection”
Swift Advances plc do not hold the required category on their CCA licence to collect debts …….even their own (OFT state that would be required)
Why is it that Swift Advances plc never contact any customer under that name, in any form of correspondence, it is all done via a trading name(s) that were up until the date referred to unlicensed
Sparkie
EQUIFAX LTD. CRA
.“Each Equifax client is required to sign a contract prior to gaining access to our system. This contract stipulates that the client in question must seek consent, from the individual concerned, prior to supplying Equifax with insight information. Equifax works closely with our clients to ensure that they fully understand this requirement which is specified under the current Data Protection Act. It is the responsibility of the client in question to ensure that this consent is sought and that appropriate records are maintained to substantiate each account supplied to Equifax.”
I posted this on the Swift Advances plc thread…but I think as this points to problems for & with the CRA’s Callcredit and Equifax. I decided to start a new thread solely devoted to .this……I’m going to disect the statement above as follows, and, for these reasons stated.
Swift Advances plc do have a data controllers licence….but….
There are no other names stated on this licence indicating that they will supply data under no other name than Swift Advances plc.
First off…….“Each Equifax client is required to sign a contract prior to gaining access to our system.
Swift Advances plc will/should have signed the above mentioned contract, this should match their data controllers licence.
That would allow Swift Advances plc to access the CRA’s data base under the stated name to supply information and data and carry out searches on credit files………….only under that name.
Everyone knows that it has been discovered that the CRA Equifax data base is accessed and information is supplied by “Swift Group” about agreements entered into by borrowers with Swift Advances plc.
1…Swift Group, are an unrecognised body
2...Swift Group, up until 6th October 2010 were an unlicensed trading name.
3…Swift Group, could not and did hold their own data controllers licence, that would give that name/entity the authority to provide data and information to third parties and that includes the CRA’s.
4…The information supplied to the CRA’s by Swift Group is information about the account under and related to a consumer credit agreement, it matters not what type of consumer credit agreement all that matters is that it is a consumer credit agreement.
5…This would be in law construed not as conducting actual consumer credit business, but, as conducting consumer credit related business.
6…Under Section 39 (1) Conducting consumer credit business or consumer credit related business for which a CCA licence is required is a criminal offence, furthermore under section 39(2)a licensee who uses a name to conduct consumer credit business or consumer credit business that is not on said licence commits a criminal offence.
7…To access the CRA data bases and supply information the supplier has to have signed the contract with the CRA allowing that access. ( All CRA’s require this contract to be signed by said supplier of data)
8…Swift Group have no such contract in place with Equifax the CRA they supply data to, only Swift Advances plc have signed such contract ….but Swift Advances plc are not the suppliers of any of the information that is supplied to & held by the CRA Equifax.
9…I have questioned Equifax about all these issues and supplied them with many documents as evidence that Equifax are in complete breach of the DPA by initially accepting data from
a) an unrecognised body and;
b) an unlicensed trading name; and further more, continuing to accept data from a trading name that is not included in the contract initially signed by Swift Advances plc and which is not named in their own Data Controllers specific licence.
Callcredit Ltd CRA
Everything above applies to Callcredit……………Except……..the supplier of the data and information to them is “Swift Advances”.
So where in the above instead of “Swift Group” insert and read….. “Swift Advances”.
Questions I leave everyone with over all this……………….It is Swift Advances plc that hold the CCA licence…………it is Swift Advances plc that hold the data controllers licence ……but as seen it not under that name that all this information is supplied to the CRA’s……….why not? Why do they supply the two different CRA’s with the same information under two different unlicensed names?
Why? When it comes to the search, that is made on a customers credit file to check on their credit status on default of the agreement with Swift Advances plc. They search under the name of Swift Advances plc.
The search record states the reason for the search as “ Debt Collection”
Swift Advances plc do not hold the required category on their CCA licence to collect debts …….even their own (OFT state that would be required)
Why is it that Swift Advances plc never contact any customer under that name, in any form of correspondence, it is all done via a trading name(s) that were up until the date referred to unlicensed
Comment