Hi all,
I wonder if anyone can advise me on my problem.
On 21 Aug at approx 10:50AM, I received a visit from a bailiff from Rundle & co who said he was acting on behalf of sutton council. He showed me his ID and wanted to know if a Miss G(full name is being omitted on here for obvious reasons.) lived at my address. I told him that she did not. He wanted to know if she had ever lived here to which I said that according to my landlord she did live here before I did. He then wanted to know when I had moved in and I told him on 22 Nov 2010. He asked me for my full name and I gave it to him. (Not sure why he wanted my name as he was looking for a female whilst I am a male.) He then thanked me for my time and left.
Previously, I had received three letters from the sutton council, all of them being addressed to the named lady. I returned the first two unopened, using the return to sender method. The last one was returned, unopened, to the council offices in person, on 13 Feb 2013 together with a letter and a copy of my council tax bill. In the letter I told the council that the person they were writing to did not live at my address and that I did not know her or of her whereabouts. I asked them to stop sending letters to my address for this lady. I never heard from them since then. Instead, I received two letters from Rundles in June this year(2015), both letters were addressed to this same lady. I had intended to reply to Rundles to inform them of the situation, but unfortunately I got bogged down with other important personal matters and inadvertantly forgot about the bailiff matter.
I am now considering filing a formal complaint with the council because I don't believe that the council had the right to send baillifs to my door regarding a matter which does not concern me and especially because the council knows that person being sought does not reside at my address.
However, I am not sure who is to blame here: The council or the Baillif company. Hence the need to seek advice. Can anyone help?
I wonder if anyone can advise me on my problem.
On 21 Aug at approx 10:50AM, I received a visit from a bailiff from Rundle & co who said he was acting on behalf of sutton council. He showed me his ID and wanted to know if a Miss G(full name is being omitted on here for obvious reasons.) lived at my address. I told him that she did not. He wanted to know if she had ever lived here to which I said that according to my landlord she did live here before I did. He then wanted to know when I had moved in and I told him on 22 Nov 2010. He asked me for my full name and I gave it to him. (Not sure why he wanted my name as he was looking for a female whilst I am a male.) He then thanked me for my time and left.
Previously, I had received three letters from the sutton council, all of them being addressed to the named lady. I returned the first two unopened, using the return to sender method. The last one was returned, unopened, to the council offices in person, on 13 Feb 2013 together with a letter and a copy of my council tax bill. In the letter I told the council that the person they were writing to did not live at my address and that I did not know her or of her whereabouts. I asked them to stop sending letters to my address for this lady. I never heard from them since then. Instead, I received two letters from Rundles in June this year(2015), both letters were addressed to this same lady. I had intended to reply to Rundles to inform them of the situation, but unfortunately I got bogged down with other important personal matters and inadvertantly forgot about the bailiff matter.
I am now considering filing a formal complaint with the council because I don't believe that the council had the right to send baillifs to my door regarding a matter which does not concern me and especially because the council knows that person being sought does not reside at my address.
However, I am not sure who is to blame here: The council or the Baillif company. Hence the need to seek advice. Can anyone help?
Comment