Hi all,
I wonder if anyone can advise me on my problem.
On 21 Aug at approx 10:50AM, I received a visit from a bailiff from Rundle & co who said he was acting on behalf of sutton council. He showed me his ID and wanted to know if a Miss G(full name is being omitted on here for obvious reasons.) lived at my address. I told him that she did not. He wanted to know if she had ever lived here to which I said that according to my landlord she did live here before I did. He then wanted to know when I had moved in and I told him on 22 Nov 2010. He asked me for my full name and I gave it to him. (Not sure why he wanted my name as he was looking for a female whilst I am a male.) He then thanked me for my time and left.
Previously, I had received three letters from the sutton council, all of them being addressed to the named lady. I returned the first two unopened, using the return to sender method. The last one was returned, unopened, to the council offices in person, on 13 Feb 2013 together with a letter and a copy of my council tax bill. In the letter I told the council that the person they were writing to did not live at my address and that I did not know her or of her whereabouts. I asked them to stop sending letters to my address for this lady. I never heard from them since then. Instead, I received two letters from Rundles in June this year(2015), both letters were addressed to this same lady. I had intended to reply to Rundles to inform them of the situation, but unfortunately I got bogged down with other important personal matters and inadvertantly forgot about the bailiff matter.
I am now considering filing a formal complaint with the council because I don't believe that the council had the right to send baillifs to my door regarding a matter which does not concern me and especially because the council knows that person being sought does not reside at my address.
However, I am not sure who is to blame here: The council or the Baillif company. Hence the need to seek advice. Can anyone help?
I wonder if anyone can advise me on my problem.
On 21 Aug at approx 10:50AM, I received a visit from a bailiff from Rundle & co who said he was acting on behalf of sutton council. He showed me his ID and wanted to know if a Miss G(full name is being omitted on here for obvious reasons.) lived at my address. I told him that she did not. He wanted to know if she had ever lived here to which I said that according to my landlord she did live here before I did. He then wanted to know when I had moved in and I told him on 22 Nov 2010. He asked me for my full name and I gave it to him. (Not sure why he wanted my name as he was looking for a female whilst I am a male.) He then thanked me for my time and left.
Previously, I had received three letters from the sutton council, all of them being addressed to the named lady. I returned the first two unopened, using the return to sender method. The last one was returned, unopened, to the council offices in person, on 13 Feb 2013 together with a letter and a copy of my council tax bill. In the letter I told the council that the person they were writing to did not live at my address and that I did not know her or of her whereabouts. I asked them to stop sending letters to my address for this lady. I never heard from them since then. Instead, I received two letters from Rundles in June this year(2015), both letters were addressed to this same lady. I had intended to reply to Rundles to inform them of the situation, but unfortunately I got bogged down with other important personal matters and inadvertantly forgot about the bailiff matter.
I am now considering filing a formal complaint with the council because I don't believe that the council had the right to send baillifs to my door regarding a matter which does not concern me and especially because the council knows that person being sought does not reside at my address.
However, I am not sure who is to blame here: The council or the Baillif company. Hence the need to seek advice. Can anyone help?


The Black rat (Rattus rattus) is a common (hence the accusation of being Pleb) long-tailed rodent of the genus Rattus (rats) in the subfamily Murinae (murine rodents). The species originated in tropical Asia and spread through the Near East in Roman times (another thing that we ought to thanks the Romans for, besides roads, aqueducts and public toilets) before reaching Europe by the 1st century and spreading with Europeans across the world.

Comment