Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

[bluebottle]

Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

I sense another bailiff kicking programme coming up, most likely highlighting A & E units for bailiffs who get caught trying to rob innocents of their cars.

IFYPFY :grin:

[daisychain]

Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

[/B]
IFYPFY :grin:

oh and i have more good news! anglian water head office phoned me today the debt has gone back to them so i dnt pay marston exciting fees ! aw are tripping over themselves tryin to put it right now. and got an apology too

[bluebottle]

Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

oh and i have more good news! anglian water head office phoned me today the debt has gone back to them so i dont pay marston exiting fees ! Truly excellent news. I bet you are well-pleased with that.

aw are tripping over themselves tryin to put it right now. They haven't got much choice. Fate has a strange way of working and, eventually, repeated wrongdoing and injustice towards others tends to come back and bite you on the bum, which is what appears to have happened to AW in your case. However, once fate has sunk its teeth into your gluteus maximus once, it will keep doing it until all injustices are put right.

and got an apology too I bet they were gutted having to do that. Serves them right, though.

Responses in red text.

[bizzybob]

Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

They probably inflated the original arrears with fees to get it above the £600 to get the writ of fi-fa a naughty trick used by Water Companies in particular Aw and SW. Time their CEO and Board who have individual liability get done for fraud, or whatever offences can be laid on them, along with Marstons..

[daisychain]

Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

Responses in red text.

im really pleased. was worrying about marstons fees! but i learnt alot too. i was speaking to another lb member last nite bout an aw/marstons case. seems to be a trend at the mo!

[Amethyst]

Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

That's wonderful news. Just a shame they can't treat all people properly without the threat of media exposure.

[bluebottle]

Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

They probably inflated the original arrears with fees to get it above the £600 to get the writ of fi-fa a naughty trick used by Water Companies in particular Aw and SW. Time their CEO and Board who have individual liability get done for fraud, or whatever offences can be laid on them, along with Marstons..

You've hit the nail right on the head there, BB. That's exactly what they do. I've seen evidence of it myself. Not only is it misleading the court, which if committed by a legal professional is serious professional conduct, it may well be grounds for revoking a CCJ and Writ of Fi Fa due to them being obtained by deception. Given the two cases that came onto the LB forums and LB member who rang me directly, it does beg the question as to how many other people are the victim of an industry that resorts to enriching itself in this manner. There needs to be a major investigation into the practices of the water industry - regardless of any bleating and howling from the City of London and Westminster.

[daisychain]

Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

You've hit the nail right on the head there, BB. That's exactly what they do. I've seen evidence of it myself. Not only is it misleading the court, which if committed by a legal professional is serious professional conduct, it may well be grounds for revoking a CCJ and Writ of Fi Fa due to them being obtained by deception. Given the two cases that came onto the LB forums and LB member who rang me directly, it does beg the question as to how many other people are the victim of an industry that resorts to enriching itself in this manner. There needs to be a major investigation into the practices of the water industry - regardless of any bleating and howling from the City of London and Westminster.

something needs to be done! if it wasnt for johns advice and this forum i wouldve been paying all that money down the plughole! the one thing that does make me angry bout the whole thing is my children witnessed marstons bullying tactics. they were in the house when the levy took place and my 5 year old was too scared to go to school incase our things would taken and he came home to an empty house. grrrr. but all over now thank god!

[bizzybob]

Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

You've hit the nail right on the head there, BB. That's exactly what they do. I've seen evidence of it myself. Not only is it misleading the court, which if committed by a legal professional is serious professional conduct, it may well be grounds for revoking a CCJ and Writ of Fi Fa due to them being obtained by deception. Given the two cases that came onto the LB forums and LB member who rang me directly, it does beg the question as to how many other people are the victim of an industry that resorts to enriching itself in this manner. There needs to be a major investigation into the practices of the water industry - regardless of any bleating and howling from the City of London and Westminster.

Southern water were caught out doing that the other year, I think that one was on CAG.

Main thing is AW and the duplicitous nasty excuse for a company Marstons have had a tolchock to the yarbles from none other than John Kruse

[bluebottle]

Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

Southern water were caught out doing that the other year, I think that one was on CAG.

Main thing is AW and the duplicitous nasty excuse for a company Marstons have had a tolchock to the yarbles from none other than John Kruse

I think it's going to be a case of maintaining the pressure on AW and ramping it up as and when necessary. No way must they be allowed to walk away from this and do it again further down the line. Now that Marstons have been given a scare, they need to be given more - a lot more.

[bizzybob]

Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

I think it's going to be a case of maintaining the pressure on AW and ramping it up as and when necessary. No way must they be allowed to walk away from this and do it again further down the line. Now that Marstons have been given a scare, they need to be given more - a lot more.

The HCEO wasn't called McGovern was he? If he was it would not go well for Marstons.

[bluebottle]

Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

The HCEO wasn't called McGovern was he? If he was it would not go well for Marstons.

McGovern is certified as a bailiff at Exeter Combined Court Centre. I am not aware of him being appointed an HCEO.

[bluebottle]

Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

something needs to be done! if it wasnt for johns advice and this forum i wouldve been paying all that money down the plughole! the one thing that does make me angry bout the whole thing is my children witnessed marstons bullying tactics. they were in the house when the levy took place and my 5 year old was too scared to go to school incase our things would taken and he came home to an empty house. grrrr. but all over now thank god!

Would you like the email address for Marston Group's CEO?

Oh look, it's suddenly appeared. I wonder how that happened?

gareth.hughes@marstongroup.co.uk

[daisychain]

Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

Would you like the email address for Marston Group's CEO?

Oh look, it's suddenly appeared. I wonder how that happened?

gareth.hughes@marstongroup.co.uk

ha ha thanks but ive already sent the email out to him

[daisychain]

Re: Vulnerable household yet still have a walking posession agreement

The HCEO wasn't called McGovern was he? If he was it would not go well for Marstons.

hceo wasnt mcgovern. it was a lady officer k laflin