Good morning guys,
I have filed a complaint against a bailiff who has incorrectly clamped my vehicle, even though a warrant had been revoked.
I sent the distress for rent regulations compalint through to the HMCS, with evidence of the clamp and evidence of the warrant being revoked.
The judge has returned a decline of my complaint with the following reason:
I have not understood the limitations of the admittedly inadequate, complaints procedure under the distress for rent regulations. A complaint can only deal with the personal conduct of the Bailiff concerned. It does not and cannot deal with the efficency or mistakes of the organisation which employs him.
My decision that there will be no oral hearing is final.
Any suggestions any one?
I have filed a complaint against a bailiff who has incorrectly clamped my vehicle, even though a warrant had been revoked.
I sent the distress for rent regulations compalint through to the HMCS, with evidence of the clamp and evidence of the warrant being revoked.
The judge has returned a decline of my complaint with the following reason:
I have not understood the limitations of the admittedly inadequate, complaints procedure under the distress for rent regulations. A complaint can only deal with the personal conduct of the Bailiff concerned. It does not and cannot deal with the efficency or mistakes of the organisation which employs him.
My decision that there will be no oral hearing is final.
Any suggestions any one?
Comment