I has become apparent ( to me) that these companies are using " delaying " tactics when responding to
sects. 77.78 .79 Requests CCA 1974.
Recently Cabot has responded to request sent to the claimant MFP Ltd, returning the request and fee
because the PO was not made payable to Cabot.
Hillesden has returned requests as not made Payable to Hillesden Securities T/A DLC.
Apart from the incidents here I have 3 more on my desk today.
My feeling is when ever Cabot " interveens " in requests sent to the named claimant it should
be reported to the FCA.
I would be willing to collate and send a group report.
nem.
sects. 77.78 .79 Requests CCA 1974.
Recently Cabot has responded to request sent to the claimant MFP Ltd, returning the request and fee
because the PO was not made payable to Cabot.
Hillesden has returned requests as not made Payable to Hillesden Securities T/A DLC.
Apart from the incidents here I have 3 more on my desk today.
My feeling is when ever Cabot " interveens " in requests sent to the named claimant it should
be reported to the FCA.
I would be willing to collate and send a group report.
nem.
Comment