• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Cabot, Hillesden Securites Ltd T/A DLC, Marlin Portfolio Ltd.

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cabot, Hillesden Securites Ltd T/A DLC, Marlin Portfolio Ltd.

    I has become apparent ( to me) that these companies are using " delaying " tactics when responding to
    sects. 77.78 .79 Requests CCA 1974.
    Recently Cabot has responded to request sent to the claimant MFP Ltd, returning the request and fee
    because the PO was not made payable to Cabot.

    Hillesden has returned requests as not made Payable to Hillesden Securities T/A DLC.

    Apart from the incidents here I have 3 more on my desk today.

    My feeling is when ever Cabot " interveens " in requests sent to the named claimant it should
    be reported to the FCA.

    I would be willing to collate and send a group report.

    nem.
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Cabot, Hillesden Securites Ltd T/A DLC, Marlin Portfolio Ltd.

    Recently Cabot has responded to request sent to the claimant MFP Ltd, returning the request and fee
    because the PO was not made payable to Cabot.
    Doesn't really matter. If the claimant is MFP ltd that's who the request should be sent to. If the claimant gets the request it only matters whether a valid response, in terms of enforceability, is received or not as the case may be.

    Of course if a claimant refuses to accept they are the creditor then that opens up an enormous can of worms for them as they have no standing to bring the claim in the first place.

    M1

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Cabot, Hillesden Securites Ltd T/A DLC, Marlin Portfolio Ltd.

      Cabot /Hillesden as far as I can see have not mentioned anywhere that PO's should
      be made payable to Cabot.
      The claimant named on the N1 has been clear in every one of these returned requests.

      nem

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Cabot, Hillesden Securites Ltd T/A DLC, Marlin Portfolio Ltd.

        Originally posted by nemesis45 View Post
        Cabot /Hillesden as far as I can see have not mentioned anywhere that PO's should
        be made payable to Cabot.
        The claimant named on the N1 has been clear in every one of these returned requests.

        nem
        The point is, that if it was sent to the claimant then the clock runs. If the claimant is not the creditor then the claim is dead.

        Chain mail, origami or sticking it up their arse makes no difference.

        M1

        Comment

        View our Terms and Conditions

        LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

        If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


        If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
        Working...
        X