• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Greenhouse not fit for purpose

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Greenhouse not fit for purpose

    Apologies if I have not posted this on the right thread!

    On the 31st January I purchased a polycarbonate greenhouse online from Waltons.co.uk at £529.94. I laid concrete slabs at my own cost to accommodate the greenhouse and had to pay for two people to put the greenhouse together. The greenhouse was erected to the specification as instructed by waltons. I also bought a substantial amount of plants. At the beginning of May there was a windy day with strong gusts of wind and the greenhouse completely fell apart blowing windows all over the place and destroying the frame and all the plants contained. Luckly I was nearby with two friends to help before anyone got hurt. My wife took pictures of the greenhouse just falling apart in the wind. I emailed the company including photos to explain the situation and my frustration at how the greenhouse could not withstand the wind and therefore was not fit for purpose. Waltons replied that they would not give me a refund as this was an act of god and to contact my insurance company! I rang Waltons and had a lengthy discussion with a member of their customer service staff who would not admit that the greenhouse was not fit for purpose even though it was not strong enough to withstand a windy day in May when all the greenhouses in the same area were all still standing. Waltons insisted that I did not have a complaint when the greenhouse was delivered therefore their only offer was to replace the glass. I explained that it’s like a builder building a new home for someone and then on the first windy day the roof blows off and the builder sayes ‘it’s an act of god’, surely this can’t be right, and Waltons should advise that this green house is not suitable to withstand strong winds. I am so angry at the financial loss I have incurred due to Waltons and anxious to get advice on what are the proper legal steps I should take to pursue this matter. Many thanks
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Greenhouse not fit for purpose

    Contact Consumer Direct, on 0845 4 04 05 06, or your local Trading Standards wallahs at the Town Hall, or sue the suppliers.

    Did the frame of the greenhouse fall apart and, if it did, had it been correctly assembled?

    Had it been bolted together or had the installers just used Blu-tak or chewing gum to hold the bits in place?

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Greenhouse not fit for purpose

      Seems you're not alone:

      Waltons 8'x6' Extra Tall Polycarbonate Greenhouse Reviews | Greenhouses | Review Centre

      An Act of God constitutes a flood, tornado, volcano, lightning strike etc, so this is a very flimsy excuse.

      This site seems to get Walton's attention when people post negative reviews, they only have an overall satisfaction score of 6.8 so they need to improve.

      Waltons Garden Buildings reviews | Customer reviews of Waltons Garden Buildings

      Put your complaint in writing, discount the Act of God rubbish, threaten Consumer Direct etc and if that all fails file a claim against them for the value of the greenhouse, the plants inside and the labour cost for installation.
      "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

      I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

      If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

      If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Greenhouse not fit for purpose

        Alternatively, ask them for proof of the involvement of their chosen sky fairy, then elicit their assistance to sue the Church of Rome who claim to be His earthly agents.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Greenhouse not fit for purpose

          Reminds me of the joke about the guy who bought a newspaper shop..........

          Sorry! :brick:

          Seriously though, as CC mentioned in #2, how do you prove it was installed properly?
          CAVEAT LECTOR

          This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

          You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
          Cohen, Herb


          There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
          gets his brain a-going.
          Phelps, C. C.


          "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
          The last words of John Sedgwick

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Greenhouse not fit for purpose

            Originally posted by charitynjw View Post
            Reminds me of the joke about the guy who bought a newspaper shop...
            Which folded as soon as it rained because the newspapers got wet?

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Greenhouse not fit for purpose

              Did you pay with a credit card?

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Greenhouse not fit for purpose

                Originally posted by Caspar View Post
                Did you pay with a credit card?
                If they did, they might be able to invoke section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 - link; if they'd used a Visa debit card, they might be able to get a refund via a charge-back.

                However, unless the greenhouse supplier installed the greenhouse, the quality of assembly would be the responsibility of the purchaser or of the wallahs hired to put it together. As assembly of such a greenhouse is somewhat easier than building a model in Meccano, it is not readily understandable how the greenhouse might "fall apart" even when subjected to a strong wind.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Greenhouse not fit for purpose

                  You are a mind reader CC!

                  Comment

                  View our Terms and Conditions

                  LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                  If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                  If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                  Working...
                  X