DCB have sent a claim form to me about a parking charge from March 2020.
I have written the following defence.
Firstly, I would inform you that the driver of the vehicle (Reg
Number xxx xxx) on the date and time in question did not actually
park the vehicle at the location detailed on the claim form. The
driver of the vehicle entered the location detailed on the claim
form, however they did not actually stop to park the vehicle. I
would also add that if the driver of the vehicle did intend to
park the vehicle, they would not have been able to as the location
did not have a convenient car parking space for the driver of the
vehicle.
Secondly, I received the following letters in relation to the
claim. Dates given are dates on the letter and not the dates that
I received the letters.
Date: 16th June 2023 – Letter from ZZPS Ltd informing me that I
have a debt of £170 to be paid or an arrangement put in place
within 14 days or the debt will progress to GCTT certified
enforcement agent.
Date 26th June 2023 – Letter from GCTT informing me of a notice of
transfer to solicitors. I am advised that unless payment is
received in full within 14 days of the date of the letter, the
account will be sent to a solicitor.
Please note. The letter from GCTT (Dated 26th June 2023) was
received 10 days after the letter from ZZPS (dated 16th June
2023). They did not give me the allocated time of 14 days to agree
payment or a put an arrangement in place.
Date 07th July 2023 – Letter from QDR solicitors received asking
me to make payment of the debt within 14 days.
Please note. The letter from QDR solicitors (Dated 07th July 2023)
was received 11 days after the letter from GCTT (dated 26th June
2023). They did not give me the allocated time of 14 days to agree
payment.
I am therefore disputing this claim based on the details given
above.
My question is. Does anyone consider this a valid defence in court?
I have written the following defence.
Firstly, I would inform you that the driver of the vehicle (Reg
Number xxx xxx) on the date and time in question did not actually
park the vehicle at the location detailed on the claim form. The
driver of the vehicle entered the location detailed on the claim
form, however they did not actually stop to park the vehicle. I
would also add that if the driver of the vehicle did intend to
park the vehicle, they would not have been able to as the location
did not have a convenient car parking space for the driver of the
vehicle.
Secondly, I received the following letters in relation to the
claim. Dates given are dates on the letter and not the dates that
I received the letters.
Date: 16th June 2023 – Letter from ZZPS Ltd informing me that I
have a debt of £170 to be paid or an arrangement put in place
within 14 days or the debt will progress to GCTT certified
enforcement agent.
Date 26th June 2023 – Letter from GCTT informing me of a notice of
transfer to solicitors. I am advised that unless payment is
received in full within 14 days of the date of the letter, the
account will be sent to a solicitor.
Please note. The letter from GCTT (Dated 26th June 2023) was
received 10 days after the letter from ZZPS (dated 16th June
2023). They did not give me the allocated time of 14 days to agree
payment or a put an arrangement in place.
Date 07th July 2023 – Letter from QDR solicitors received asking
me to make payment of the debt within 14 days.
Please note. The letter from QDR solicitors (Dated 07th July 2023)
was received 11 days after the letter from GCTT (dated 26th June
2023). They did not give me the allocated time of 14 days to agree
payment.
I am therefore disputing this claim based on the details given
above.
My question is. Does anyone consider this a valid defence in court?
Comment