OFT v Banks Judgment 25th November 2009 - 9.45am- Supreme Court - Test case

[EXC]

Re: OFT v Banks Judgment 25th November 2009 - 9.45am- Supreme Court - Test case

Interesting quote from George Osborne from a BBA publication today:

http://www.bba.org.uk/content/1/c6/0...0Issue%203.pdf

''Our plans would also tackle weaknesses in the consumer regime by creating a new consumer-orientated, transparent and focused Consumer Protection Agency. This body will be given a mandate to act as a consumer champion and by taking over consumer credit regulation from the Office of Fair Trading it will create a unified regulatory regime for financial services firms and consumers.''

[PocketTheDifference]

Re: OFT v Banks Judgment 25th November 2009 - 9.45am- Supreme Court - Test case

Have just recieved my letter from Natwest stating that they are following up on the complaints I've made, are willing to go no further as the point im trying to argue is no longer valid as of "Certain date" * people. If I DO not reply within 14days they will consider my case closed.

Oh the words i would like to call these people, It feels like a cocky letter from them!!!

[Jester]

Re: OFT v Banks Judgment 25th November 2009 - 9.45am- Supreme Court - Test case

I've not received anything from the courts stating that First Direct are applying for a strike out of my claim yet !!

[Amethyst]

Re: OFT v Banks Judgment 25th November 2009 - 9.45am- Supreme Court - Test case

Yorkshire Bank Claimants in Court - please read !

[EXC]

Re: OFT v Banks Judgment 25th November 2009 - 9.45am- Supreme Court - Test case

Yorkshire Bank Claimants in Court - please read !

Yorkshire Bank Claimants in Court - please contact your court - Legal Beagles

[Amethyst]

Re: OFT v Banks Judgment 25th November 2009 - 9.45am- Supreme Court - Test case

Whoopsydaisy ! Thanks EXC

[EXC]

Re: OFT v Banks Judgment 25th November 2009 - 9.45am- Supreme Court - Test case

[Amethyst]

Re: OFT v Banks Judgment 25th November 2009 - 9.45am- Supreme Court - Test case

You wouldn't have it any other way

[PocketTheDifference]

Re: OFT v Banks Judgment 25th November 2009 - 9.45am- Supreme Court - Test case

If you where to have a similar reply to what i have had of the money grabbing sons of *#$*@'s what would you do from there?
Thanks Guys
Also Not with Yorkshire, But whats the dealio in Lame-mans terms?

[Yoda]

Re: OFT v Banks Judgment 25th November 2009 - 9.45am- Supreme Court - Test case

They seem to be getting excited over the road about European law. Means nothing to me.

Post 4603 onwards

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...-test-231.html

[natweststaffmember]

Re: OFT v Banks Judgment 25th November 2009 - 9.45am- Supreme Court - Test case

I think we had that discussion a few month ago with the same case law.

[Yoda]

Re: OFT v Banks Judgment 25th November 2009 - 9.45am- Supreme Court - Test case

Ok Thanks. Looking at your avatar. Are you involved in this dicussion over the road?

[natweststaffmember]

Re: OFT v Banks Judgment 25th November 2009 - 9.45am- Supreme Court - Test case

Yes, unfortunately.......

[Amethyst]

Re: OFT v Banks Judgment 25th November 2009 - 9.45am- Supreme Court - Test case

pmsl he gets about a bit . Have a look at ' Burden of Proof under UTCCR ' on here most of that case law being discussed OTR is on there.

Also if u are looking at that route have a look at Article 4 mentions in the SC Judgment and the different countries implementation of the EU Directives, esp Spain, and as a forerunner to the Directive, Germany.

(not much help unless we/the government/the court/the OFT get a referral to the ECJ )

[EXC]

Re: OFT v Banks Judgment 25th November 2009 - 9.45am- Supreme Court - Test case

Note on burden of proof in consumer cases by Tom Brennan.

All the case laws quoted in it were discussed in the test case hearings.