• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Appeal Judgment - 26th February 2009 - OFT v Abbey National Plc & Otrs

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Appeal Judgment - 26th February 2009 - OFT v Abbey National Plc & Otrs

    Top man
    The banks have argued all along that their charges are fair, reasonable and perfectly legal. If their appeal is successful it will be a mortal blow to the efforts of the OFT and bank charges campaigners.
    To argue their case, the banks have employed one of the UK's leading civil barristers, Jonathan Sumption QC.
    "If anyone can do it for the banks, he can, but he's got an uphill task," said another barrister who specialises in banking, Ray Cox QC.
    "But you can never be sure; the Law Lords will certainly not rubber-stamp the decisions of the other courts," he added.
    If the OFT wins, it will be the end of the first part of what is in fact a two-part test case, settling only the issue of the OFT's jurisdiction.

    Comment

    View our Terms and Conditions

    LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

    If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


    If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
    Working...
    X