Re: Voluntary Termination
[QUOTEI would not agree to pay for anything which was there when I bought the vehicle. You did not cause the damage, why should you pay for it?[/QUOTE]
Hi Guys
so BMW Finance picked the car up with German like efficiency(just days after receiving the VT form). A chap came and inspected the vehicleand came back with his electrical device and said the only fault he found wasthe alloys and he would have to report this back to BMW as “significant damage”because the scratches is over 25mm. I stated that I would not sign to say I wasliable/caused this damage, which he was very nice about and stated that thiswas nothing to do with liability, more so the marks are present, and that he asthe collection agent hasn’t caused thedamage. 9the damage is present so I can deny that)
so the inevitable phone call has been received by BMWstating they want £220 for loss of value due to the damage to the alloys
I explained the damage was already there when I bought itwhich was reflected in the price at the time, and further outlined that the caris 9 years old having had 6 owners in that time. it is in immaculate conditionthroughout (apart from the alloys) to which BMW have agreed.
So they have asked me now to prove that the damage was therewhen I bought it!! Really!! Is it not for them to prove it wasn’t??
How do I know take this forward?? as there is absolutely noway I am paying out £220 for something I haven’t done, not a chance!!
cheers
[QUOTEI would not agree to pay for anything which was there when I bought the vehicle. You did not cause the damage, why should you pay for it?[/QUOTE]
Hi Guys
so BMW Finance picked the car up with German like efficiency(just days after receiving the VT form). A chap came and inspected the vehicleand came back with his electrical device and said the only fault he found wasthe alloys and he would have to report this back to BMW as “significant damage”because the scratches is over 25mm. I stated that I would not sign to say I wasliable/caused this damage, which he was very nice about and stated that thiswas nothing to do with liability, more so the marks are present, and that he asthe collection agent hasn’t caused thedamage. 9the damage is present so I can deny that)
so the inevitable phone call has been received by BMWstating they want £220 for loss of value due to the damage to the alloys
I explained the damage was already there when I bought itwhich was reflected in the price at the time, and further outlined that the caris 9 years old having had 6 owners in that time. it is in immaculate conditionthroughout (apart from the alloys) to which BMW have agreed.
So they have asked me now to prove that the damage was therewhen I bought it!! Really!! Is it not for them to prove it wasn’t??
How do I know take this forward?? as there is absolutely noway I am paying out £220 for something I haven’t done, not a chance!!
cheers
Comment