Re: CCJ - Parking Control Management
So PCM had 2 cases today. myself and another defendant. We asked to be seen together. When the judge called us all in, he asked why we want to be seem together. He said the other parties defence was very different to mine but I was welcome to sit in.
He was the other defendant first and it boiled down to the signage not being visible enough and the station drop of area being closed. Defendant won the case.
When my turn came, he told me that we had an issue. As my defence was whollly reliant on a technicality, and I had no other defence, it would impossible for me to defend. He said he would allow the particulars of the claim as it was followed up by a witness statement which explained what it was about. I had ample time to prepare a proper defence.
I said I had additional defence but he said he would not allow any additional evidence. I stated the evidence would be based on the bundle from the claimant anyway. He asked me to briefly explain my defence. I went on to say about the signage etc and he said I was just utilising the defence of the case before mine.
He said I could request to adjourn, in order to create a defence. Claimant objected and judge refused the adjournment. I asked to appeal and he said refused but explained how I could put in an application.
That was pretty much it
So PCM had 2 cases today. myself and another defendant. We asked to be seen together. When the judge called us all in, he asked why we want to be seem together. He said the other parties defence was very different to mine but I was welcome to sit in.
He was the other defendant first and it boiled down to the signage not being visible enough and the station drop of area being closed. Defendant won the case.
When my turn came, he told me that we had an issue. As my defence was whollly reliant on a technicality, and I had no other defence, it would impossible for me to defend. He said he would allow the particulars of the claim as it was followed up by a witness statement which explained what it was about. I had ample time to prepare a proper defence.
I said I had additional defence but he said he would not allow any additional evidence. I stated the evidence would be based on the bundle from the claimant anyway. He asked me to briefly explain my defence. I went on to say about the signage etc and he said I was just utilising the defence of the case before mine.
He said I could request to adjourn, in order to create a defence. Claimant objected and judge refused the adjournment. I asked to appeal and he said refused but explained how I could put in an application.
That was pretty much it
Comment