Civil Enforcement Ltd County Court Business Centre Claim

[ostell]

So you post up on an image hosting site, such as imgur, and add a link to your photo on here.

[charitynjw]

It doesn't let me post them properly on here and they're very unclear. Is there an email add I can send them to for you to see?

You could use a hosting site such as imgur & link it to this thread.

[Lyat]

Hold the phone, I just got a copy of the CEL defence from CEL directly with an offer to discontinue if I am willing to drop my own claim. Have a look at their defence. I have to say I am actually offended that they referred to my claim for loss of my husband's earnings and me winding up in the hospital was merely me losing some of my "leisure time" ?! I'm trying to attach the letter and defence and some evidence sheet they also attached. Should I negotiate with them in writing as I want to be compensated for what they did to me which was not just a petty complaint of loss of "me-time"? What would you suggest?

[Lyat]

The attachments...

[charitynjw]

In their defence to the counterclaim, imho they have either completely misunderstood the counterclaim, or they are trying to pull the wool over the court's eyes.
They seem to be blathering on about how one can't sue someone for bringing a court claim.
But your counterclaim is for harassment, & discrim via EqA.......that's a completely different matter.
My gut feeling is that they are running scared.....probably because they realise what a complete c*ckup they've made.
Obviously the decision whether to accept a 'drop-hands' must be yours to accept or refuse.
But (again, imho) I cannot see how a court would see any unreasonable behaviour on your part should you choose to reject their *generous* offer.

[Lyat]

[ostell]

[charitynjw]

[Lyat]

No I'm not claiming for time, I claimed for loss of earnings plus emotional and physical distress due to their harassments. I also don't believe a duty of care is actually required for them to be in breach of the EqAct. They are simply breaking the law of they act in a manner that discriminates against a qualifying class especially if they know they're doing it surely?

[charitynjw]

No I'm not claiming for time, I claimed for loss of earnings plus emotional and physical distress due to their harassments.
Why not both?
I also don't believe a duty of care is actually required for them to be in breach of the EqAct. They are simply breaking the law of they act in a manner that discriminates against a qualifying class especially if they know they're doing it surely?
Tbh, that is for the judge to decide.

####

[Lyat]

loss of earnings and physical distress leading to hospitalisation

[charitynjw]

It is also a possible breach of data protection laws and current GDPR regulations to have enclosed the details pertaining to the case of Mr A**** S*** without any clear consent.

Scrub this bit.
Court cases & decisions are a matter of pblic record & so there cannot be any data breach there.
Imho, as there has been no real mention of any potential data breach up until now, if it were me I wouln't bother mentioning it at all.
How about

Your defence submitted to the counterclaim lists a number of inaccuracies, all of which will be brought to attention when evidence is submitted for the hearing. I would also like to call to your attention that when no contravention had occurred due to the impossibility of the PCN you had falsely insinuated a charge existed you unlawfully obtained and misused the personal data of the motorist in violation of the Data Protection Act 2018/GDPR.
Your recent letter requesting a drop-hands agreement suggests that, in this very late stage of the proceedings, you have finally realised that your actions to date have been deplorable.
From the very beginning of this sorry affair it was pointed out to yourselves that it was due to your own failures (in particular the impossibility of being allowed to pay at the time of the alleged incident) that this matter has now reached the latter stages of a county court claim.
As a result of your intransigent position, & despite every effort on the Defendant's part to reasonably pay the original fee for parking, you have instead insisted on an ever increasing demand for what any reasonable byestander would see as some type of penalty payment which has had serious consequences to the health of the Defendant.
Please note that the counter offer made does not include costs due to your unreasonable behaviour in this matter.
Should this go to a court hearing, these costs will be sought in addition to the counterclaim.

[charitynjw]

& give them a deadline for a response.

EDIT
Lol.....you already have done!

[Lyat]

[charitynjw]

Looks good to me.
Keep a copy & get proof of sending.