Tweet
Re: ParkingEye Court threat
I find myself asking questions as to why the judge suddenly decided to go from a full hearing to paperwork only. I also find myself asking questions as to whether the case raises questions as to the equitable jurisdiction of the court. It is no good the court bleating that you agreed to it. The court staff should explain to you what a paper hearing entails, the downside and of your inalienable right to have your case heard in a court. In some circumstances, Civil Procedures Rules come close to breaching Articles 6, 17 and 18 and, consequently, Section 6, Human Rights Act 1998 and, on occasions, drive a coach and horses through the Articles.
However, my gut-instinct is that no reasonable or fair-minded or right-minded person, in possession of the facts of the case and applicable case and statute law, would consider the judgement to be equitable or that of a reasonable or right-minded person.
I find myself asking questions as to why the judge suddenly decided to go from a full hearing to paperwork only. I also find myself asking questions as to whether the case raises questions as to the equitable jurisdiction of the court. It is no good the court bleating that you agreed to it. The court staff should explain to you what a paper hearing entails, the downside and of your inalienable right to have your case heard in a court. In some circumstances, Civil Procedures Rules come close to breaching Articles 6, 17 and 18 and, consequently, Section 6, Human Rights Act 1998 and, on occasions, drive a coach and horses through the Articles.
However, my gut-instinct is that no reasonable or fair-minded or right-minded person, in possession of the facts of the case and applicable case and statute law, would consider the judgement to be equitable or that of a reasonable or right-minded person.
Comment