Input Para 4:
4. The Notice to Keeper issued to the Defendant fails to specifically identify the location in which the alleged incident occurred as required by the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. The address and postcode provided relates to two separate Car Park areas.
Amended Para 8 (subsequently now 9):
9. The Defendant wishes to also advise the court that the signage within the Car Park fails to comply with section 18.3 of the British Parking Associations Code of Practice. "Signs must be conspicuous and legible, and written in intelligible language, so that they are easy to see, read and understand". Based on the alleged incident being at a time of darkness in the evening, there is a failure to adhere to this as absolutely no lighting is provided within the area of the Car Park. Photographic evidence provided by the Defendant can confirm this.
4. The Notice to Keeper issued to the Defendant fails to specifically identify the location in which the alleged incident occurred as required by the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. The address and postcode provided relates to two separate Car Park areas.
Amended Para 8 (subsequently now 9):
9. The Defendant wishes to also advise the court that the signage within the Car Park fails to comply with section 18.3 of the British Parking Associations Code of Practice. "Signs must be conspicuous and legible, and written in intelligible language, so that they are easy to see, read and understand". Based on the alleged incident being at a time of darkness in the evening, there is a failure to adhere to this as absolutely no lighting is provided within the area of the Car Park. Photographic evidence provided by the Defendant can confirm this.
Comment