Originally posted by des8
View Post
I read up on both nuisance and harassment (revisiting my days as a law student) and the concept of malice in nuisance blurred the lines between nuisance and harassment to my mind because it seems clear that you can deliberately cause nuisance to cause distress.
I'm trying to brace myself for a disappointing outcome following my conversation with Irwin Mitchell. I imagine if I'm lucky funding for a strong cease and desist letter will be agreed. If my neighbours a quiet for a year after that I may have a chance to sell my property for what it's worth. I know that the Law isn't about fairness, but there should be some consequences for people like my neighbours.
Comment