Good evening
I'm new here and just seeking some advice. I sold my property to my tenant and now the estate agent believe they are due a fee. I am feeling extremely stressed by this and just want to pay them the fee, however it does seem to me like they aren't deserving of a commission. Details as follows -
The Flat was on the market for sale with the agent with no success. Agent suggested to rent it out. I decided to look into extending leasehold at this point to make the sale more attractive and agreed to put it up for lease - short term. Two offers for lease and zero offers for sale, disappointingly. Once I had agreed to lease it I informed agent verbally that I wished to remove the property from sale.
The Agent has told me that the tenant was shown around as a buyer initially and not as a tenant. I challenge this. I was never informed of his interest as a buyer as this would have been my preference. I was also told that he was currently going through a divorce and was selling a property he owned with his wife. He was currently living with his mother and looking for a place to rent. My preference would have been to sell and I was not comfortable with renting and having a random person in my property. So much so that the estate agent had to ring me to put my mind at rest when I told them I had changed my mind and didn't intend to rent any longer. That conversation changed my mind and the rent went ahead. Therefore I don't believe he was introduced to the property as a buyer but as a tenant for a lease. The agent has been paid for this as per our agreement at 10% per month.
A few months later, the tenant approached me around whether I'd be interested in selling. I said I would be once the lease has been extended. But our expectations of price were too far apart. A month or two later he approached me again and we agreed a price. I checked the terms of business for the lease and no mention of commission for the agent was specified. The agent played no part in the negotiations or the sale. I therefore don't believe the agent is due any commission. Their view is different and believe they are covered with the initial sales agreement because they introduced the tenant to the property as a buyer.
I'm interested in views here and whether I should pay the commission. I'm a fair man and if it's due, I would pay
Thank you
edit - I have just looked at the information they sent me post sale. Apparently he viewed the property twice but didn't make an offer, according to the database they use. I was unaware of this when negotiating the price
I'm new here and just seeking some advice. I sold my property to my tenant and now the estate agent believe they are due a fee. I am feeling extremely stressed by this and just want to pay them the fee, however it does seem to me like they aren't deserving of a commission. Details as follows -
The Flat was on the market for sale with the agent with no success. Agent suggested to rent it out. I decided to look into extending leasehold at this point to make the sale more attractive and agreed to put it up for lease - short term. Two offers for lease and zero offers for sale, disappointingly. Once I had agreed to lease it I informed agent verbally that I wished to remove the property from sale.
The Agent has told me that the tenant was shown around as a buyer initially and not as a tenant. I challenge this. I was never informed of his interest as a buyer as this would have been my preference. I was also told that he was currently going through a divorce and was selling a property he owned with his wife. He was currently living with his mother and looking for a place to rent. My preference would have been to sell and I was not comfortable with renting and having a random person in my property. So much so that the estate agent had to ring me to put my mind at rest when I told them I had changed my mind and didn't intend to rent any longer. That conversation changed my mind and the rent went ahead. Therefore I don't believe he was introduced to the property as a buyer but as a tenant for a lease. The agent has been paid for this as per our agreement at 10% per month.
A few months later, the tenant approached me around whether I'd be interested in selling. I said I would be once the lease has been extended. But our expectations of price were too far apart. A month or two later he approached me again and we agreed a price. I checked the terms of business for the lease and no mention of commission for the agent was specified. The agent played no part in the negotiations or the sale. I therefore don't believe the agent is due any commission. Their view is different and believe they are covered with the initial sales agreement because they introduced the tenant to the property as a buyer.
I'm interested in views here and whether I should pay the commission. I'm a fair man and if it's due, I would pay
Thank you
edit - I have just looked at the information they sent me post sale. Apparently he viewed the property twice but didn't make an offer, according to the database they use. I was unaware of this when negotiating the price
Comment