I am just looking for some advice.
We had an architect draw up full plans for a planning application for a double storey extension which was refused, we then had the plans revised to a slightly different layout then finally had plans drawn up for a single storey extension and loft conversion. We finally got planning. We used those plans to get builder quotes and got a structural engineer to do their drawings. Once the builder was on site we realised we also needed building control sign off too so they were sent the same plans and on one of their many (many) visits it transpires that because we now have 3 storey's we have to make fire safety changes too. In our case we could either install a fire sprinkler system (costly) or enclose our downstairs stairs by adding a new wall to create an enclosed means of escape.
I think understandably I am not pleased as this is not only additional unforeseen cost but it will change part of house that we hadn't realised. My feeling is the architect would have known about this at the outset and should have told us - he obviously disagrees and I was wondering if we had any recourse or if I was being unreasonable?
Thanks in advance for any advice
We had an architect draw up full plans for a planning application for a double storey extension which was refused, we then had the plans revised to a slightly different layout then finally had plans drawn up for a single storey extension and loft conversion. We finally got planning. We used those plans to get builder quotes and got a structural engineer to do their drawings. Once the builder was on site we realised we also needed building control sign off too so they were sent the same plans and on one of their many (many) visits it transpires that because we now have 3 storey's we have to make fire safety changes too. In our case we could either install a fire sprinkler system (costly) or enclose our downstairs stairs by adding a new wall to create an enclosed means of escape.
I think understandably I am not pleased as this is not only additional unforeseen cost but it will change part of house that we hadn't realised. My feeling is the architect would have known about this at the outset and should have told us - he obviously disagrees and I was wondering if we had any recourse or if I was being unreasonable?
Thanks in advance for any advice
Comment