Hello,
By searching google I can see this has happened to a number of people
however there hasnt been any conclusion so here is my problem and not sure where I stand.
Out of the blue I received a shocking & demanding email from buymobiles asking me for £360
or return of goods within 7 days as, as they say I have been disconnected from T-Mobile.
In April 2013 I followed a link from HDUK for a Nexus 4 at £15.50 a month with a free phone.
I took up this offer and received said phone and paid T-Mobile every month
however on the 18 month due to the small amount of minutes I had I decided to buy out my contract
by ringing up T-Mobile and asking for a pac code which in turn gave me a final bill of approx £66.
I then checked using checkmend if T-Mobile had a hold on the phone and it came up clear
so sold it and used the money to pay off my bill.
I then took out another contract with EE.
Now I have received this email and am very annoyed about it,
one
that the phone was advertised as free,
two
that the phone was £279 new at the time and after 18 months is no where near worth £360
three
that I dont know where I stand.
Also they state I have recently been disconnected and have not fullfilled the minimum 2 years.
But i have as I bought out the remaining months and T-Mobile said thats all I need to pay.
I have just checked the terms on their site and the only one was EE and that states after six months the phone is mine to keep.
I am not sure what the terms stated at the time of purchase or if I actually read them.
I have finished off contracts before and have not had this happen.
The email is in my next post.
I understand these are not terms so not sure where they have come from and why they are paragraphed the way they are.
Seems to me this company are bullies and have found a way of demanding extra money from customers
when they upgrade etc early using another company or provider.
Using "waybackmachine" I have found the original offer give or take a day
and it clearly says phone FREE as does their terms however it seems the phone isnt free its on loan.
Buymobiles have informed me there are two contracts one for the network and one for the phone.
I emailed them back and I have just received this reply.
I asked for a breakdown of their loss in me ending the contract early, I didnt get one.
I told them i bought the contract out so their argument is with T-Mobile not me.
I asked for a hard copy of the terms of the sale which they sent but they are different to the ones i have but they could easily be changed in their favour if they think I dont have them.
"In regard to this the payment for the goods or return of the goods has been requested
as the network have advised us that the contract has been disconnected during the minimum term.
When you placed the order you entered into two contracts,
one for the airtime which is with the network provider
and one contract for the goods which is with ourselves.
A disconnection of any kind within the minimum term is a breach of this agreement,
if you have ended the contract early this is still classed as a disconnection .
We require the debt to be paid to ourselves or the goods returned,
the amount due is the handset cost + VAT.
I have attached the Terms and Conditions which is your agreement . "
No where did it say I was entering into two contracts.
If they are saying the phone was part of a loan agreement
then law states they must send me an agreement to which I sign
which includes the terms. This didnt happen.
Annoyingly I was going to keep the phone and tariff as a spare but wanted my gold number to use on my new contract.
I didnt even save much ending it approx £25. Kicking myself! dont know which way to turn now.
I am still unsure if they are right
I have as recommended by CAB emailed a letter with an offer for the average cost of the phone in todays market
or a replacement phone but I will need to buy another phone.
I have not heard anything back in relation to my offer but received via email a new letter of demand instead this time headed A1 Comms, the other was headed buymobiles.
Not sure if its being ignored so will have to post it recorded instead, sending Monday.
I have found the Sales of Goods Act 1982 which refers to supplying goods free during a contract
but as a layman its a bit hard to understand most or all of it or if any applies to this and if in my favour or not.
If they choose to ignore my offer then that wont go in their favour and if it does got to a debt recovery
I shall be sending a Cease & Desist letter for the amount they are asking.
Not sure if I send it to Buymobiles or wait till it goes to debt recovery which I dont want it to
but if they abide by the C&D letter then at least a judge will see the debt and may get my day in court.
It has been brought to my attention by A1 that i had two contracts this wasnt pointed out
and no way was I aware of it.
If this is the case of two contracts one being with T-Mobile and one with A1
then the phone was surely lent to me for a period of 24 months and in my eyes that is a loan agreement
to which I never signed nor did I receive by post a hard copy of an agreement to sign.
Unless I am wrong thinking it is a loan? It would be interesting to know if "a company" should have a CCA when offering free goods subject to a contract but add in their T&C a clawback value for said goods if the contract is broken. Or even if its subject to a higher purchase agreement.
I might be clutching here!
thanks for any forthcoming advice and will reply asap.
By searching google I can see this has happened to a number of people
however there hasnt been any conclusion so here is my problem and not sure where I stand.
Out of the blue I received a shocking & demanding email from buymobiles asking me for £360
or return of goods within 7 days as, as they say I have been disconnected from T-Mobile.
In April 2013 I followed a link from HDUK for a Nexus 4 at £15.50 a month with a free phone.
I took up this offer and received said phone and paid T-Mobile every month
however on the 18 month due to the small amount of minutes I had I decided to buy out my contract
by ringing up T-Mobile and asking for a pac code which in turn gave me a final bill of approx £66.
I then checked using checkmend if T-Mobile had a hold on the phone and it came up clear
so sold it and used the money to pay off my bill.
I then took out another contract with EE.
Now I have received this email and am very annoyed about it,
one
that the phone was advertised as free,
two
that the phone was £279 new at the time and after 18 months is no where near worth £360
three
that I dont know where I stand.
Also they state I have recently been disconnected and have not fullfilled the minimum 2 years.
But i have as I bought out the remaining months and T-Mobile said thats all I need to pay.
I have just checked the terms on their site and the only one was EE and that states after six months the phone is mine to keep.
I am not sure what the terms stated at the time of purchase or if I actually read them.
I have finished off contracts before and have not had this happen.
The email is in my next post.
I understand these are not terms so not sure where they have come from and why they are paragraphed the way they are.
Seems to me this company are bullies and have found a way of demanding extra money from customers
when they upgrade etc early using another company or provider.
Using "waybackmachine" I have found the original offer give or take a day
and it clearly says phone FREE as does their terms however it seems the phone isnt free its on loan.
Buymobiles have informed me there are two contracts one for the network and one for the phone.
I emailed them back and I have just received this reply.
I asked for a breakdown of their loss in me ending the contract early, I didnt get one.
I told them i bought the contract out so their argument is with T-Mobile not me.
I asked for a hard copy of the terms of the sale which they sent but they are different to the ones i have but they could easily be changed in their favour if they think I dont have them.
"In regard to this the payment for the goods or return of the goods has been requested
as the network have advised us that the contract has been disconnected during the minimum term.
When you placed the order you entered into two contracts,
one for the airtime which is with the network provider
and one contract for the goods which is with ourselves.
A disconnection of any kind within the minimum term is a breach of this agreement,
if you have ended the contract early this is still classed as a disconnection .
We require the debt to be paid to ourselves or the goods returned,
the amount due is the handset cost + VAT.
I have attached the Terms and Conditions which is your agreement . "
No where did it say I was entering into two contracts.
If they are saying the phone was part of a loan agreement
then law states they must send me an agreement to which I sign
which includes the terms. This didnt happen.
Annoyingly I was going to keep the phone and tariff as a spare but wanted my gold number to use on my new contract.
I didnt even save much ending it approx £25. Kicking myself! dont know which way to turn now.
I am still unsure if they are right
I have as recommended by CAB emailed a letter with an offer for the average cost of the phone in todays market
or a replacement phone but I will need to buy another phone.
I have not heard anything back in relation to my offer but received via email a new letter of demand instead this time headed A1 Comms, the other was headed buymobiles.
Not sure if its being ignored so will have to post it recorded instead, sending Monday.
I have found the Sales of Goods Act 1982 which refers to supplying goods free during a contract
but as a layman its a bit hard to understand most or all of it or if any applies to this and if in my favour or not.
If they choose to ignore my offer then that wont go in their favour and if it does got to a debt recovery
I shall be sending a Cease & Desist letter for the amount they are asking.
Not sure if I send it to Buymobiles or wait till it goes to debt recovery which I dont want it to
but if they abide by the C&D letter then at least a judge will see the debt and may get my day in court.
It has been brought to my attention by A1 that i had two contracts this wasnt pointed out
and no way was I aware of it.
If this is the case of two contracts one being with T-Mobile and one with A1
then the phone was surely lent to me for a period of 24 months and in my eyes that is a loan agreement
to which I never signed nor did I receive by post a hard copy of an agreement to sign.
Unless I am wrong thinking it is a loan? It would be interesting to know if "a company" should have a CCA when offering free goods subject to a contract but add in their T&C a clawback value for said goods if the contract is broken. Or even if its subject to a higher purchase agreement.
I might be clutching here!
thanks for any forthcoming advice and will reply asap.
Comment