Hi,
Now, I realise that some time ago it was detrmined by a court that the matter of placing a Default on your credit file was not to be consiodered "Enforcement" under the CCA 74 (where agreement found to be UNenforceable).
I forget the case that dealt with this - could someone point to it as reference?
So, what situation would we need to have to get this somewhat ridiculous set of events overturned in a higher court?
As in, to get a higher court to determine placing a Default on someones credit file for a debt that cannot be enforced by a court is unreasonable
Now, I realise that some time ago it was detrmined by a court that the matter of placing a Default on your credit file was not to be consiodered "Enforcement" under the CCA 74 (where agreement found to be UNenforceable).
I forget the case that dealt with this - could someone point to it as reference?
So, what situation would we need to have to get this somewhat ridiculous set of events overturned in a higher court?
As in, to get a higher court to determine placing a Default on someones credit file for a debt that cannot be enforced by a court is unreasonable
Comment