If someone gets provoked through a breach of peace to hit someone else and hits them and they aren't extreme. They hit them in arms and push them over. That person leaves them and doesn't intend for any additional harm to be caused.
If someone else hits the same person. But they seriously injure the person.
And someone else watches but doesn't take part or encourage violence.
The first person to hit would be convicted for assault. The second person to hit would be convicted for GBH. Unless you can be convicted for being present and not calling an ambulance then I believe the bystander wouldn't be convicted.
Would the first person to hit be convicted for the second person's actions? Would the bystander be convicted for not calling an ambulance? Is some kind of agreement to do something that is illegal required for there to be any shared liability between the defendants?
If someone else hits the same person. But they seriously injure the person.
And someone else watches but doesn't take part or encourage violence.
The first person to hit would be convicted for assault. The second person to hit would be convicted for GBH. Unless you can be convicted for being present and not calling an ambulance then I believe the bystander wouldn't be convicted.
Would the first person to hit be convicted for the second person's actions? Would the bystander be convicted for not calling an ambulance? Is some kind of agreement to do something that is illegal required for there to be any shared liability between the defendants?
Comment