Hi All,
I could do with you help with a disciplinary that I have been called into about not doing overtime.
I have spoken to ACAS but they cant really help me about the wording of my contract. Not sure who to turn to as this could result in dismissal and I am sure this guy is victimising me.
The wording in my contract says "you will normally work a 40 hour week with a 24/7 shift pattern. Additionally you MAY also be required to fulfil duties required on out of hours occasions dependant on the business needs"
I have underlined "May",am I right in saying this would mean that I would get asked but not told to do overtime, which would mean that I am not contract to do overtime?
I will give you a rough idea about what as happened to the build up of this disciplinary, so if you could make me aware of anything that you think he might be in the wrong,
Got called into a investigation about 5 different issues of which my shift partner was also involved in 4 of the issues.
in the investigation I gave relevant reasons for all points, which my shift partner didn't.
The next time I know anything about what is going on is when he hands me a envelope containing my contract, disciplinary procedure and a letter inviting me to a formal disciplinary meeting explain that it was about not wanting to do overtime unless it was paid at 1.5x, which is correct.
I will mention that my shift partner hasn't received a disciplinary because he does overtime but he wasn't able give relevant reasons for the other points.
I would appreciate any help with this issue as I am concerned that he is after getting me the sack.
I could do with you help with a disciplinary that I have been called into about not doing overtime.
I have spoken to ACAS but they cant really help me about the wording of my contract. Not sure who to turn to as this could result in dismissal and I am sure this guy is victimising me.
The wording in my contract says "you will normally work a 40 hour week with a 24/7 shift pattern. Additionally you MAY also be required to fulfil duties required on out of hours occasions dependant on the business needs"
I have underlined "May",am I right in saying this would mean that I would get asked but not told to do overtime, which would mean that I am not contract to do overtime?
I will give you a rough idea about what as happened to the build up of this disciplinary, so if you could make me aware of anything that you think he might be in the wrong,
Got called into a investigation about 5 different issues of which my shift partner was also involved in 4 of the issues.
- Overtime
- Leaving a peace of equipment unsafe
- mobile phones
- using a ipad in the workshop
- not fixing a peace of equipment
in the investigation I gave relevant reasons for all points, which my shift partner didn't.
The next time I know anything about what is going on is when he hands me a envelope containing my contract, disciplinary procedure and a letter inviting me to a formal disciplinary meeting explain that it was about not wanting to do overtime unless it was paid at 1.5x, which is correct.
I will mention that my shift partner hasn't received a disciplinary because he does overtime but he wasn't able give relevant reasons for the other points.
I would appreciate any help with this issue as I am concerned that he is after getting me the sack.
Comment