**DISCONTINUED** Restons / Arrow / Paragon v marketsqhero

[Diana M]

Re: Restons / Arrow / Paragon v marketsqhero

The particulars are below:

The Claimant claims payment of the overdue balance due from Defendant(s) under a contract between the Defendant(s) and Paragon dated on or about May 31 1994 and assigned to the Claimant on Sep 26 2012

Particulars a/c no - 55433770

Date - 26/07/2016

Item - Default Balance
Value - 17833.52

Item - Post Refrl Cr
Value - NIL

Total - 17833.52

There is also Court Fee of 802.51 and Legal Costs of £100 to add.

I'm not sure I understand what the date reference of 26th July 2016 relates to in the POC which you typed up in your first post.

Can you explain that?

Di

[marketsqhero]

Re: Restons / Arrow / Paragon v marketsqhero

Both of you must go online and file your Acknowledgement of Service(s) stating that you intend to defend all of the claim.

Di

Hi,

Doing that now. I assume I don't intend to contest jurisdiction of the claim made against me?

Thanks

Darren

[marketsqhero]

Re: Restons / Arrow / Paragon v marketsqhero

I'm not sure I understand what the date reference of 26th July 2016 relates to in the POC which you typed up in your first post.

Can you explain that?

Di

Hi

Not sure, the first letter we had was dated 10th August and was from Arrow stating that the management of the account had been transferred to Restons with a header of "Notification of Account Transfer to New Agency".

Basically telling us that all correspondence should be directed to Restons with their details.

August 17th was the first letter from Restons stating they were acting on behalf of Arrow.

I have no idea what the 26th July 2016 refers to, Arrow have allegedly held the account since 26th September 2012.

Regards

Darren

[marketsqhero]

Re: Restons / Arrow / Paragon v marketsqhero

Hi,

Doing that now. I assume I don't intend to contest jurisdiction of the claim made against me?

Thanks

Darren

Just a quick bump on this as I want to get the AoS sent.

Thanks for any help

Darren

[Diana M]

Re: Restons / Arrow / Paragon v marketsqhero

I assume I don't intend to contest jurisdiction of the claim made against me?

No you don't contest jurisdiction unless you're living in Scotland.

Make sure both AOS are filed - yours and your ex-wife's.

Di

[marketsqhero]

Re: Restons / Arrow / Paragon v marketsqhero

Well thanks to help and assistance from Joanna Connolly Solicitors, Restons have ceased action and discontinued their claim.

[Amethyst]

Re: Restons / Arrow / Paragon v marketsqhero

Great news marketsqhero Do you know what scared them off from continuing in the end, or just the mere mention of Jo ?

[marketsqhero]

Re: Restons / Arrow / Paragon v marketsqhero

I got a very reasonable rate from Jo as she had to file full defence as they wouldn't back down initially. They ended up backing down eventually. A lot more information came to light after I sent SAR to Paragon which I've started another thread for. My next course of action is to potentially take Paragon to court if I need to, to reclaim the over-payment of £8,000 plus Statutory for the money they took off me which they weren't allowed to (No PJI) and for selling a debt which didn't exist and forcing me to pay to defend a CCJ claim which was invalid.

http://legalbeagles.info/forums/show...aragon-Finance

[Diana M]

Re: Restons / Arrow / Paragon v marketsqhero

Well thanks to help and assistance from Joanna Connolly Solicitors, Restons have ceased action and discontinued their claim.

So Arrow won't be getting £18k from you and presumably they'll have to pay Restons their legal costs too.

Happy Days

Di