Re: Lowell portfolio /Bryan Carter V Rocky 1987
Hello Rocky apologies for the delay in sorting the letter for you, have had to be away!
So we want to suggest to Carter that he should recommend to his client that the claim should be withdrawn.
For the Personal Attention of :
Bryan Carter,
Principal
Bryan Carter LLP
Date:................................
Ref: County Court Claim No.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Your Letter dated:.....................................
Dear Mr Carter,
I am in receipt of your letter dated............... in regard to the above mentioned claim, it has been noted that your client Lowell is
willing to negotiate a settlement backed up by a Consent Order, one is driven tom wonder why Lowell should be minded to take
this approach!
I remind you that there has been no admission of any liability for the alleged debt, and indeed there will not be as I am aware
that the alleged debt is Statue Barred under the Provisions of the Limitations Act 1980.
Lowell has also failed to provide any response to my request for a copy of any agreement relating to the alleged debt, thus rendering the debt enforceable.
Given the information above I can only conclude that Lowell is only willing to " negotiate" via mediation and gain a consent order
because it's claim has no merit.
I suggest that Bryan Carter LLP inform its client of the above and recommends that the claim be withdrawn.
Any further action will be robustly defended.
I will allow 7 days for a response after which I will make application for the claim to be struck out
with your client ordered to meet all costs involved.
yours etc.,
use signed for post, check delivery date.
nem
Hello Rocky apologies for the delay in sorting the letter for you, have had to be away!
So we want to suggest to Carter that he should recommend to his client that the claim should be withdrawn.
For the Personal Attention of :
Bryan Carter,
Principal
Bryan Carter LLP
Date:................................
Ref: County Court Claim No.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Your Letter dated:.....................................
Dear Mr Carter,
I am in receipt of your letter dated............... in regard to the above mentioned claim, it has been noted that your client Lowell is
willing to negotiate a settlement backed up by a Consent Order, one is driven tom wonder why Lowell should be minded to take
this approach!
I remind you that there has been no admission of any liability for the alleged debt, and indeed there will not be as I am aware
that the alleged debt is Statue Barred under the Provisions of the Limitations Act 1980.
Lowell has also failed to provide any response to my request for a copy of any agreement relating to the alleged debt, thus rendering the debt enforceable.
Given the information above I can only conclude that Lowell is only willing to " negotiate" via mediation and gain a consent order
because it's claim has no merit.
I suggest that Bryan Carter LLP inform its client of the above and recommends that the claim be withdrawn.
Any further action will be robustly defended.
I will allow 7 days for a response after which I will make application for the claim to be struck out
with your client ordered to meet all costs involved.
yours etc.,
use signed for post, check delivery date.
nem
Comment