Re: Arrow Global/ MBNA Court hearing
Sorry. It's a supplementary witness statement. Thanks for the notes. I am aware of this case and will be using it as I remember it was ukmail they sent it by.
The statement says that the defendant has failed again to make any specific assertions to advance his submissions for documentation under section 78 and in relation to the default notice. They say that they have given me all the documentation and are asking for the defense to be struck out. It's the documentation that they have supplied is defective which I will use in my defense.
i haven't the time to compile or serve a response. I expect they will also use the lateness of the skeleton agruement as part of their defence. They'll ignore the fact their solicitor was late by 30 minutes. I understood that the skeleton agruement is the basics so that the judge can follow, with the main detail heard on court.
Does not seem fair I have to supply one on the opposition does not. Not exactly equal footing in court and goes against the principles of justice and fair hearing.
Sorry. It's a supplementary witness statement. Thanks for the notes. I am aware of this case and will be using it as I remember it was ukmail they sent it by.
The statement says that the defendant has failed again to make any specific assertions to advance his submissions for documentation under section 78 and in relation to the default notice. They say that they have given me all the documentation and are asking for the defense to be struck out. It's the documentation that they have supplied is defective which I will use in my defense.
i haven't the time to compile or serve a response. I expect they will also use the lateness of the skeleton agruement as part of their defence. They'll ignore the fact their solicitor was late by 30 minutes. I understood that the skeleton agruement is the basics so that the judge can follow, with the main detail heard on court.
Does not seem fair I have to supply one on the opposition does not. Not exactly equal footing in court and goes against the principles of justice and fair hearing.
Comment