Hello, I hope you're all doing really well.
Earlier this year, I purchased a motor vehicle from a trader, a few days later, faults occured, I contacted the trader seeking a refund (as I was entitled to), and I was ignored.
I had the defect repaired about 2 weeks later, I sent the trader a copy of the invoice in which he responded 5 minutes later essentially going off on an illiterate rant about how I should've taken the car to him, and that he won't refund my money.
I issued an LBA against him, this was ignored, and then issued proceedings against him. He acknowledged the claim immediately, however failed to file a defence within the 33 days allowed by the court, I submitted a default CCJ against him.
Roll on a month with no correspondence, and to my surprise, I receive a set aside application in the post, made by his solicitor, essentially defending the claim within this application.
I find it nothing more than an abuse of process, that after ignoring everything, failing to defend the claim, he is trying to get the CCJ set aside.
The court has referred the application to the local county court, and will be in touch shortly. Surely the defendant cannot ignore everything, file an acknowledgement of service, and ignore the claim, and then try to set it aside after a month of the CCJ being issued?
Earlier this year, I purchased a motor vehicle from a trader, a few days later, faults occured, I contacted the trader seeking a refund (as I was entitled to), and I was ignored.
I had the defect repaired about 2 weeks later, I sent the trader a copy of the invoice in which he responded 5 minutes later essentially going off on an illiterate rant about how I should've taken the car to him, and that he won't refund my money.
I issued an LBA against him, this was ignored, and then issued proceedings against him. He acknowledged the claim immediately, however failed to file a defence within the 33 days allowed by the court, I submitted a default CCJ against him.
Roll on a month with no correspondence, and to my surprise, I receive a set aside application in the post, made by his solicitor, essentially defending the claim within this application.
I find it nothing more than an abuse of process, that after ignoring everything, failing to defend the claim, he is trying to get the CCJ set aside.
The court has referred the application to the local county court, and will be in touch shortly. Surely the defendant cannot ignore everything, file an acknowledgement of service, and ignore the claim, and then try to set it aside after a month of the CCJ being issued?
Comment