Disputing defence response

[Rougeout]

I have filed a claim in small claims against a used car dealer due to them totally ignoring my request for a refund for parts i paid for on a car that i rejected under 30 day right to reject (initial rejection was sent with a copy of a inspection report that had been carried out before i had even seen the car advertised, to the dealer, broker & finance compay 18 days after taking delivery of car) due to me discovering that significant faults had been identified & an inspection report provided, some of the parts i paid to have replaced, after enquiring if these had been replaced due to age & mileage of the car, and if they would be done by the dealer (cam belt/ water pump, servicable parts). Unbeknown to me these parts were identifed as being at fault at least 1 month prior to me purchasing the car but had not been replaced by previous owner & the issues i was experiencing with the car obviously hadnt been rectified by the dealer prior to the dealer selling it to me. (Sorry if this doesnt quite make much sense. Very long story)
Without going into all the details, my partner submitted a claim for a refund via MCOL due to my laptop being broken. However he only put a brief description of my particulars of claim & not the whole situation or attached any evidence i have in order to support my claim. Upon recieving the dealers defence response i dont agree with their defence as they have stated a few incorrect & untruthful events.
I recieved this along with the directions questionare.
Is it too late to forward all my evidence to support my claim to the courts & give a full detailed particulars of claim?

[jaguarsuk]

Re: Disputing defence response

I answered your other thread here: http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...efence-dispute