Re: Bcs claim form, lowell/shop direct
I still haven't heard back from Lowell regarding my CCA request.
I have received response from BC after sending the second CPR letter and arguing the SB, and it seems they have just re-sent their first response.
''We write further to your letter dated 18 May 2015 requesting disclosure under P31 of CPR.
We can confirm the claim form was issued by the county court business centre and that the court's protocol was followed when issuing the claimant's particulars of claim. Practice direction 7c point 1.4 (3a) eliminates the requirement to attach documents to the particulars of claim when they are issued by this court.
We confirm this matter will most properly (sure they mean probably??) be allocated to the small claims track as this is a simple contractual matter and p31 of the CPR will therefore not apply. In any event the notices of default and assignment left the control of the claimant when they were dispatched to you.
It is the original creditor's policy to issue agreements at the start of the contract and statements throughout the duration of the agreement and, in this regard, we ask you to refer to your own records.
Our client's position is that the limitation period runs from the date the original creditor became entitled to demand payment. The account fell into default on 31 January 2011 and the claim was issued on 29 April 2015. It is our client's position that the account is not statute barred and that the outstanding balance remains payable by you.
We confirm our client is not agreeable to an extension for filing defence.
As you will be aware a claim was issued in this matter on or around 29 April 2015 and we are in receipt of your acknowledgement of service.
We recommend you seek independent legal advice...''
What is my next step? Add to my defence that they refused to follow CPR after a second request and continued to wrongly advise regarding the SB/limitation act?
Thanks!
I still haven't heard back from Lowell regarding my CCA request.
I have received response from BC after sending the second CPR letter and arguing the SB, and it seems they have just re-sent their first response.
''We write further to your letter dated 18 May 2015 requesting disclosure under P31 of CPR.
We can confirm the claim form was issued by the county court business centre and that the court's protocol was followed when issuing the claimant's particulars of claim. Practice direction 7c point 1.4 (3a) eliminates the requirement to attach documents to the particulars of claim when they are issued by this court.
We confirm this matter will most properly (sure they mean probably??) be allocated to the small claims track as this is a simple contractual matter and p31 of the CPR will therefore not apply. In any event the notices of default and assignment left the control of the claimant when they were dispatched to you.
It is the original creditor's policy to issue agreements at the start of the contract and statements throughout the duration of the agreement and, in this regard, we ask you to refer to your own records.
Our client's position is that the limitation period runs from the date the original creditor became entitled to demand payment. The account fell into default on 31 January 2011 and the claim was issued on 29 April 2015. It is our client's position that the account is not statute barred and that the outstanding balance remains payable by you.
We confirm our client is not agreeable to an extension for filing defence.
As you will be aware a claim was issued in this matter on or around 29 April 2015 and we are in receipt of your acknowledgement of service.
We recommend you seek independent legal advice...''
What is my next step? Add to my defence that they refused to follow CPR after a second request and continued to wrongly advise regarding the SB/limitation act?
Thanks!
Comment