Think of it that he who asserts something generally has the burden of proving it.
Let us say the claimant is pursuing an unpaid invoice. He needs to prove that his invoice has not been paid.
Let us now say that the Defendant admits he has not paid, but says the claimant did not work to an acceptable standard and therefore that the claimant is not entitled to be paid. He has the burden of proving what he has asserted.
(This is my guess what your case is all about).
Let us say the claimant is pursuing an unpaid invoice. He needs to prove that his invoice has not been paid.
Let us now say that the Defendant admits he has not paid, but says the claimant did not work to an acceptable standard and therefore that the claimant is not entitled to be paid. He has the burden of proving what he has asserted.
(This is my guess what your case is all about).
Comment