Andreas, as a director "Annabella", a limited company previously stated that your contract was with it. You have requested the he state to you the company number, he has not done so.
I assume that your letter of 15th February, described in the letter from Moxhull Hall of 22nd Feb was addressed to Annabella Limited - do please post that
letter of 15th February up.
Andreas and Bobbie, as sole traders, cannot reply lawfully reply on Moxull Hall notepaper to a letter addressed to Annabella Limited. It is to your advantage that they have done so as it helps you to sue both of them as individuals because the words of the present communication, from Andreas on Moxhull Hall paper, amounts to an admission that your contract was with Andreas and Bobbie as sole traders and not Annabella Limited
.But as Andreas has stated your contract was with Annabella Limited, that firm is also a defendant.
I would now serve the statutory demand on Annabella Limited and copy the charge holder with it. The company has 21 days make an answer.
I assume that your letter of 15th February, described in the letter from Moxhull Hall of 22nd Feb was addressed to Annabella Limited - do please post that
letter of 15th February up.
Andreas and Bobbie, as sole traders, cannot reply lawfully reply on Moxull Hall notepaper to a letter addressed to Annabella Limited. It is to your advantage that they have done so as it helps you to sue both of them as individuals because the words of the present communication, from Andreas on Moxhull Hall paper, amounts to an admission that your contract was with Andreas and Bobbie as sole traders and not Annabella Limited
.But as Andreas has stated your contract was with Annabella Limited, that firm is also a defendant.
I would now serve the statutory demand on Annabella Limited and copy the charge holder with it. The company has 21 days make an answer.
Comment