Re: Saffy's Mum's Estate and the DWP
@Sapphire: thanks for your message. In fairness, I should report that I did indeed call DWP (their 'phone number for this purpose is 0845 850 0051), and was very well treated. This was a pleasant surprise, after all of the calls I have recently made to utility companies etc (don't get me started - surely their call centres should be briefed not to act like none of their millions of customers has ever died before?).
The DWP line was answered by a real human being, who engaged in a proper discussion with me, rather than just reading things from a card, or disappearing to "speak to a supervisor".
The lady made the expected points that a) their department has a duty to taxpayers, and b) they don't have automatic access to all the Inland Revenue's information. It's her job to say that, and I acknowledged that I understood that it was, and that she was a real person like me, doing a tricky job.
She told me that we weren't being singled out - apparently, they now do it to everyone (what the value of widening their net to everyone is, I simply don't know, but it did make me feel a bit less like a criminal).
I did make the points I wrote about above, about the tone and content of the letter, quite strongly, and she said this was "being looked into". She told me they'd had a fair few complaints about their standard form. So, maybe there will be some changes for the better in time.
I did make a point of telling her clearly that, although I didn't like the message, I did appreciate the way she'd handled the call. I think it's always important to do that on the (rare) occasions when it's deserved.
I'll send in my form in a few days now. If there's a legitimate reason to pay up, I will without complaint. (But not otherwise!) Fingers crossed...
@Sapphire: thanks for your message. In fairness, I should report that I did indeed call DWP (their 'phone number for this purpose is 0845 850 0051), and was very well treated. This was a pleasant surprise, after all of the calls I have recently made to utility companies etc (don't get me started - surely their call centres should be briefed not to act like none of their millions of customers has ever died before?).
The DWP line was answered by a real human being, who engaged in a proper discussion with me, rather than just reading things from a card, or disappearing to "speak to a supervisor".
The lady made the expected points that a) their department has a duty to taxpayers, and b) they don't have automatic access to all the Inland Revenue's information. It's her job to say that, and I acknowledged that I understood that it was, and that she was a real person like me, doing a tricky job.
She told me that we weren't being singled out - apparently, they now do it to everyone (what the value of widening their net to everyone is, I simply don't know, but it did make me feel a bit less like a criminal).
I did make the points I wrote about above, about the tone and content of the letter, quite strongly, and she said this was "being looked into". She told me they'd had a fair few complaints about their standard form. So, maybe there will be some changes for the better in time.
I did make a point of telling her clearly that, although I didn't like the message, I did appreciate the way she'd handled the call. I think it's always important to do that on the (rare) occasions when it's deserved.
I'll send in my form in a few days now. If there's a legitimate reason to pay up, I will without complaint. (But not otherwise!) Fingers crossed...
Comment